Paying all workers the same salary in a company promotes harmony and respect among colleagues. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, it has been suggested that providing an equal amount of income to all the employees can lead to a homogeneous atmosphere and higher social cohesion. Yet, there remains a contentious debate as to whether can this phenomenon be a beneficial step or a destructive scenario. I partially disagree with this topic and will support my idea with more details and practical examples.
Firstly, this process can result in a significant drop in motivation among the team. In addition, this is an indisputable fact that different levels of income can make a competitive situation for all the operatives to try harder and reach higher efficiency for a better economic condition; however, providing the same financial incentive for all workers can harm this influential procedure. For instance, operators will have lower enthusiasm to work harder as there is no additional perk or promotion; it has an insurmountable impact on the overall outcome and revenue of the company. Consequently, having an equal monetary condition for staff can omit the importance of competition; also, the organization will suffer from the possible consequences, particularly lack of initiative and motivation.
On the other hand, neither discrimination nor bias will appear in the working environment. Regarding the fact that all the initiatives will be treated equally, there would be a safe and balanced condition for everyone to accentuate their tasks and project without being anxious about possible income fluctuations. One particularly salient example is the case when all the personnel are working on different parts of a project and try to share their ideas and aid each other without the afraid of being betrayed for better financial promotions. Thus, a more reliable situation will be established for the team to focus on their responsibilities and contribute more to the total efficiency of the company.
As a way of conclusion, I once again reaffirm that building this situation for employees can lead to higher trustworthiness as well as better reliability among the workers, but no competition means no effort for higher efficiency which can strongly affect the organization. In other words, it is highly recommended to have cognitive processes for the operators to keep the harmony rather than paying the same incomes.
- People are using a lot of online language translation apps Do the benefits of this outweigh the disadvantages 73
- Globalization has brought about more positive economic impacts than negative ones To what extent do you agree with this statement 11
- It is good for children to start using computers from an early age and spent long hours on them Discuss the advantages and disadvantages 78
- It is good for children to start using computers from an early age and spent long hours on them Discuss the advantages and disadvantages 78
- In some countries the number of shootings increase because many people have guns at home To what extent do you agree or disagree Give specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 200, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...Yet, there remains a contentious debate as to whether can this phenomenon be a beneficial ste...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 502, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...here is no additional perk or promotion; it has an insurmountable impact on the o...
^^
Line 5, column 284, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and project without being anxious about possible income fluctuations. One partic...
^^
Line 5, column 610, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tuation will be established for the team to focus on their responsibilities and c...
^^
Line 7, column 304, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'recommended having'.
Suggestion: recommended having
...anization. In other words, it is highly recommended to have cognitive processes for the operators t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, regarding, so, thus, well, as to, for instance, in addition, as well as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1953.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 365.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35068493151 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37092360658 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14539639533 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550684931507 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 621.9 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.1617318482 49.4020404114 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.230769231 106.682146367 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0769230769 20.7667163134 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.3076923077 7.06120827912 174% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0697284904805 0.244688304435 28% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0266070281877 0.084324248473 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0301537736031 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0454577308163 0.151304729494 30% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0177709071419 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.0946893788 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 50.2224549098 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.