People spending lot of money on mobiles, jewellery and clothes. Is it right or they should save money for future needs?

Essay topics:

People spending lot of money on mobiles, jewellery and clothes. Is it right or they should save money for future needs?

A lot of money is spend by people on materialistic things like sports cars, expensive jeweller, branded clothes and modern gadgets. Instead of all these, money should be spent on the future needs and regular amenties of life. This statement is true because earning money is not so easy process.

People, nowadays are fascinated towards the superfluous showing off their wealth by buying unnecessarily expensive things. There is no doubt that one can enjoy their life according to one’s own choices. But the main point to be noted down is the investment of money, which should be in productive way. Extravagance leads to shortage of money when it is to be needed the most. Furthermore, spending money on clothes and mobile phones is not good. It is of no use because it prevails according to the trend. Once the trend changes so that the phone is. One can not wear the same clothes again and again. It is the same in the case of jewellery also.

To this end, money should be saved for future needs. As life is not predictable, one can face any difficulty or any mishappening easily. So, they must preserve money for their bettter future. Eventhough as inflation is increasing day by day, there should ne some monetary back up to meet one’s needs.

In conclusion, it can be said that life should be spent with sheer pleasure and joy but keeping in mind the needs of tomorrow.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
Essays by user Sandeep kaur261826 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 19, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'spent'.
Suggestion: spent
A lot of money is spend by people on materialistic things like ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 648, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...It is the same in the case of jewellery also. To this end, money should be saved ...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, well, in conclusion, no doubt

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1151.0 1615.20841683 71% => OK
No of words: 242.0 315.596192385 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75619834711 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60971597002 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.595041322314 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 355.5 506.74238477 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.4119473871 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 67.7058823529 106.682146367 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.2352941176 20.7667163134 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.58823529412 7.06120827912 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30561431129 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0944366291172 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0962179028048 0.0667982634062 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179731236541 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0888364196195 0.056905535591 156% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.1 13.0946893788 62% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 50.2224549098 131% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.3001002004 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.74 12.4159519038 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 78.4519038076 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.