People think that government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problems Give your opinion

Essay topics:

People think that government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other
vehicles to solve environmental problems. Give your opinion.

For a long period of time, it has been acknowledged that the perfumes exhausted from vehicles are a main threat to the environment, especially the air quality. In order to tackle the environmental issue, many people suggest that it is vital for the government to increase the cost of fuel for vehicles. In my opinion, this is likely to be an effective measure.
To begin with, an increase in the price of fuel would discourage people’s intentions to purchase and use cars. Take Vietnam, a country where people use private vehicles frequently, for example. In the early 2010s, a modest rise of 10% in the cost of gasoline resulted in a significant decrease in the amount of traffic in the metropolitans, consequently improving the air quality. This indicates the effectiveness of the regulation in fuel cost made by the government. Hopefully, by adopting this method globally, the issue of air pollution would be addressed successfully.
Secondly, this regulation would force the car manufacturers to come up with new innovative technology that aims to protect the environment. This is attributed to the fact that old car models that are not energy-efficient would be abandoned by the majority of customers, making manufacturing companies to lose the market. With the rapid development of car engines, the amount of toxic gases released to the atmosphere would be reduced substantially. Furthermore, as cars consume less fuel, the issue of fossil fuel depletion would also be relieved.
In conclusion, I believe that raising the cost of fuel can benefit the environment in various ways. If this measure is carried out by many countries in the world, the environmental pollution, one of the most alarming problems, would be solved.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-08-18 caigicungduoc 78 view
2021-06-17 phuonglinh289 56 view
Essays by user caigicungduoc :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 12, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
For a long period of time, it has been acknowledged that the perf...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 77, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'innovative'.
Suggestion: innovative
...e the car manufacturers to come up with new innovative technology that aims to protect the env...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t alarming problems, would be solved.
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1457.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16666666667 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17801924912 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567375886525 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4098691487 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.071428571 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1428571429 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.57142857143 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24144556212 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0843153969328 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.074481847425 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150673287647 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0797339760433 0.056905535591 140% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.