Providing a national system in a country where the unemployed receive a regular payment only encourages people not to seek work and puts an unreasonable strain on a country's financial resources.
Discuss this statement and give your opinion.
Aiding the unemployed by allocating a fixed remuneration has been a hot potato since the second millennium. There are myriad reasons which point to the notion that this system should not be implemented. I opine that implementing such a policy would create chaos in the country.
To commence with, One of the prominent reasons why a such system should be abolished is because it will lead to anarchy. In other words, any government which tries to fulfill the need of the unemployed would put exorbitant pressure on the finances of the country. In other words, they will no longer be able to allocate funds towards other sectors like education and health care. In some situations, the country might end up being bankrupt and then would have to rely on funding from Union nations.
Moreover, when people get to know about such schemes, they would decide to stay home and reap the rewards of such payments without shedding a single sweat. On top of that, people would misuse this system and find loopholes in the rules to benefit from it even when they might not be unemployed. Secondly, the places where this system was started on a trial basis saw a surge in the number of corruption cases which can be detrimental and hazardous not only for the country but also for its citizens.
Lastly, people who diligently work and earn their livelihood will oppose such a scheme as they are the ones who pay the taxes and help run the country. They would not want their money to go awry as they expect the government to provide them with the necessary amenities. This would ultimately lead to protests and can cause a paramount conundrum in the nation.
In recapitulation, despite some suggestions to implement such a system for the betterment of the unemployed, I deem that the drawbacks of it are far more and hence such a system will not be a boon for the nation in the longer run.
- Nuclear energy is a better choice for meeting increasing demand agree or disagree 92
- You recently moved to a new house and you want to invite an old friend to stay with you Write a letter to your friend In your letter invite him to stay and suggest a date briefly describe the new house and garden say why you like your new house 73
- The table below shows the population of three cities in 1990 the population forecast of 2000 and the actual of 2000 89
- The charts below show the percentage of monthly household income spent on various items by two different groups in one European country 78
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 381, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...sectors like education and health care. In some situations, the country might end ...
^^
Line 9, column 232, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... boon for the nation in the longer run.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, lastly, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, in other words, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1555.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71212121212 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55939365237 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560606060606 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3327092887 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.071428571 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5714285714 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134398925039 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0452878205633 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.029737209177 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.072612101481 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.029524787729 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 50.2224549098 130% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 12.4159519038 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.