Q: Successful sports professionals can earn great deal more money than people in other important professions. Some people think this is fully justified while other think it is unfair.Discuss both these views and give your opinion.

Essay topics:

Q: Successful sports professionals can earn great deal more money than people in other important professions. Some people think this is fully justified while other think it is unfair.
Discuss both these views and give your opinion.

There is no gainsaying that the topic has gained immediate attention owing to its uniqueness. There are two dimensions to this topic; more clearly, there are two points of view. A group of individual asserts that sports person enjoy additional monetary benefits as compared to other renowned professionals and it is justified whereas other group is of the view that there should be balance and undue attention and monetary benefits should not be granted to sports personalities. Let’s discuss both impressions in detail before reaching to a final verdict.
To start with, there is no denial that sports personality get the edge upon other professional personality. It is due to the fame they enjoy, the importance of their sports in people’s life and last but not the least, the fan following. For instance, we all know that around the globe two sports hype never gets fade. One is football and other is cricket. People are so passionate, attached and enthusiastic about these games that they see their players as someone out of this world. To elucidate it further, people go crazy for Messi (football player) and Sachin Tendulkar (Cricket player) that they even commit suicide if these players performed bad.
It is quite evident that this sort of fame provides the platform for these celabritities to crack other business deals to acquire more money. A good example would be sports persons working in commercials, selling different products. For instance, Virat Kohli (Cricket Player) can be seen in energy boosting drink ad. Another example would be Wasim Akram (Former Cricket player) can be seen in Diabetes strips product ad and the list goes on.
These sorts of engagements provide them more monetary benefits as compared to other professionals. On the other hand, other professions like businessman, film stars also do enjoy fan following but not this much as these sports persons do. Their roles, nature of work does not have room for such money making deals.
To recapitulate the aforementioned argument, this fact holds true for sports persons that they enjoy extra attention and money benefits and in my opinion they are pretty justified as they have earned this by performing in their respective sports.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 383, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'balanced'?
Suggestion: balanced
...oup is of the view that there should be balance and undue attention and monetary benefi...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 458, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'sport'.
Suggestion: sport
...etary benefits should not be granted to sports personalities. Let's discuss both ...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 562, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ail before reaching to a final verdict. To start with, there is no denial that s...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, thus, whereas, for instance, sort of, in my opinion, to start with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1861.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 364.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11263736264 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69021420065 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568681318681 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 567.0 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.6292428985 49.4020404114 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.388888889 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2222222222 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251594603004 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0746789622391 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0468666180891 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134990283143 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0265909820327 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.