Restoration of old buildings in main cities involves enormous government expenditure. It would be more beneficial to spend this money to build new houses and roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include examples

Essay topics:

Restoration of old buildings in main cities involves enormous government expenditure. It would be more beneficial to spend this money to build new houses and roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include examples from your own experience.

The majority of central and big cities meet new challenges with old buildings. They are usually in the centre of city and look not so good as new buildings. The authority of many cities decided to renovate most part of historical houses instead of crashing/demolishing it.
Unfortunately, this process of recovery can take a huge part of city’s budget. However, some people consider, that we should spend this money to expand our cities and create new areas and districts. I disagree with this point of view, because for me as a resident of that “new district” it does not seem like a good idea to use method of building new and new zones with huge houses.
Firstly, we have to respect our history and architecture with all their types. This beautiful and superb houses from the past remind us that who we are now and who we were in the past. The old buildings create a unique view of the city and make it famous/attractive for lots of tourists from the all world.
Secondly, unlimited construction of new regions outside city with residential areas can break connections with other parts of city and provide awful consequences for all people of the city, because it means that the government should waste too much time and money to control this separated regions. Sometimes, this kind of areas become slums with high rate of crimes and poverty.
In the Saint-Petersburg, the city where I live, we have the similar problems which was noted above. There are too many isolated districts in the edges of city with a lot of monstrous and huge typical houses for new residents. It is cheaper than house in the centre of city, but it makes disaster for social part of city’s life, because these regions haven’t got any developed infrastructure and transport system.
Finally, it is obvious that humanity should protect our legacy and create all conditions to keep city comfortable and safe for all residents. Thus, it means that restoration of old building should be in the first priority for the government policy.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-01-12 musgus 73 view
2019-01-12 musgus 56 view
Essays by user musgus :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, thus, kind of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1696.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 346.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90173410405 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89002889812 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537572254335 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 530.1 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.974637998 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.0 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.625 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217187156818 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0769499834953 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0518761744134 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117973252372 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0312188501047 0.056905535591 55% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.