The restoration of old buildings in major cities around the world costs enormous amount of money This money would be better spent on providing new housing and road development To what extent do you agree or disagree

Historic building are part of a country's heritage. A lot of money spend into the past Culture by government, but I think this money involves in the new technology sucha as, new housing and new roads. I finally disagree to the given statement and I justify my opinion in the following paragraph.

Initially, I believe they should be protected some old building like Museum, Heritage, library, old Garden and so on. They give character to city and attract tourist and government can earn from the heritage places. For instance, Rani udyamati made a Rani ki vav in the Patan however, it is a very popular sport of the Gujarat and I think of 500 to 700 visitor to visit it. Besides, it is give a message for everyone how people lived in the past period, in other words they should need regular repair and maintenance. Anyone damage to our culture, so they should make stringent rules to the people.

On the other hand, other believes this money should be utility in the modern buildings. Modern culture should be designed to the environment friendly, therefore it can be alleviate the pollution. They should use the new tools and use less energy and produce less waste, in add modern insulation can make houses more energy efficient. A good example, people put the solar and wind power on a terrace which can be generate electricity. They should make new six lane roads that direct join some Mega cities and it can be reduce the traffic congestion.

In conclusion, it can be finally said the issue of government should spend money on looking after historical building which give our identity in outside countries.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 251, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...aces. For instance, Rani udyamati made a Rani ki vav in the Patan however, it is...
^^
Line 3, column 271, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Rani udyamati made a Rani ki vav in the Patan however, it is a very popular spor...
^^
Line 3, column 355, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of the Gujarat and I think of 500 to 700 visitor to visit it. Besides, it is give...
^^
Line 3, column 357, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'visitor' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'visitors'.
Suggestion: visitors
... the Gujarat and I think of 500 to 700 visitor to visit it. Besides, it is give a mess...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 529, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'Anyone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'damages'.
Suggestion: damages
... regular repair and maintenance. Anyone damage to our culture, so they should make str...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 487, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...make new six lane roads that direct join some Mega cities and it can be reduce th...
^^
Line 7, column 38, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... In conclusion, it can be finally said the issue of government should spend mon...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, finally, however, if, look, so, therefore, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in other words, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1340.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80286738351 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56171872906 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573476702509 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.7306907377 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.7142857143 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9285714286 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.14285714286 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169441984713 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0585299259354 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0539267529393 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112630817433 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0530716862708 0.056905535591 93% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.