Over a century, the quality of environment has been deteriorating due to the excessive use of fossil fuel which emits hazardous substances in the atmosphere. However, some people do not understand the repurcussions and keeps on doing these things. Low level of education is the leading cause and educating them is the powerful method which will be discussed in the subsequent paragraphs.
There are two main causes associated with ignorant behaviour of people. To begin with, lack of education in developing countries is the crucial factor as people do not study about the importance and bad effects of energy pollutants which goes back in the environment and adversely affect our life. They only think of how to earn money and fulfill their family commitments. Hence, lack of awarness is directly connected to level of education. In addition, many people possess behaviour where they intentionally do not want to put any efforts. It has been seen many times when people say they cannot make changes alone. However, contribution of every individual is required and appreciable. For instance, highly educated people often throw garbage on the road out of their cars which is clearly a sign of irresponsible nature.
Are there any solutions to this problem? Certainly, there are many. Firstly, the government can play an imperative role in order to reduce the amount of pollution which has detrimental impacts on the ambience. The authorities can make some stringent laws so that people will abide by the rules. Also, they can impose fines on people who are affecting the atmosphere in any manner. For instance, there should be high panelty on burning the fossil fuel unneccessarily. Secondly, the government can take initiatives to commence the awareness programs and educate the public. These measures will significantly improve the knowledge and decrease the impacts on the environment.
To summarize, the problem occurs owing to uneducation and unawareness but government can punish and spread cognizance in order to curb the issue.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, for instance, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1718.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26993865031 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92350439378 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60736196319 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 552.6 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.331027509 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.9 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.45 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230251563419 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0552142021051 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0492419838629 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114353643466 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0605826357271 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.