It is widely believed that the government should pay for the public vehicles and it should be available free of cost for the citizens. I completely agree with the statement as it will help to improve the environment and reduce the traffic congestion on the roads.
To begin with, providing free transportation services will reduce the number of private vehicles on the street. Because individuals will prefer to commute by free buses, trains, and tubes, it will deteriorate the traffic blockage. For instance, on an average every working person spends 2 hours commuting one way leaving their morning regime in a hurry to reach the office. However, free transport will not only allow some extra time to finish breakfast in the morning but also reduce the irritation factor while driving. Besides this, it saves the cost of filling the petrol or CNG tanks. Moreover, using public transport will reduce the traffic, cost and save time.
Furthermore, with the increasing users of public vehicles, the pollution will be in control. Because a growing number of people will start using buses for daily commuting, there will be less toxic gases emission from the cars. Nowadays, every family whether affluent or middle class owns a car for their convenience which increases the air quality index. To corroborate, Delhi government is providing free access to local buses and more individuals are taking advantage of that which consequently improving the air quality. If the government of every country takes more such initiatives, people will rather choose public transport, and hence, we would be living in a pollution free world.
In conclusion, the more people are motivated to use free of cost vehicles, the less contamination there will be.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1465.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17667844523 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68447999498 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583038869258 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.5453452369 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 104.642857143 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2142857143 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.28571428571 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228374726226 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0851500625392 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0736862730521 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16412046042 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0473303899722 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.