Smoking not only harms the smoker but also those who are nearby Therefore smoking should be banned in public places To what extent do you agree or disagree

Many people who smoke not only suffer from diseases but also close surrenders. That is why this habit should be prohibited in non smoking areas. I completely agree with this point of view, smoking is unhealthy for everyone, and government should support anti-smoking activities and build a smoking areas.
Firstly, health organisations and researches are proven that smoke is one of the most unhealthy habits that cause deadly diseases like cancer. Poor people struggling with this sticky habit and suffer from smell, hard breathing, yellow teeth and even cancer. Moreover, it could harm a non-smoker even harder. For instance, my friend developed asthma because her father smoked in their apartment when she was a child.
Secondly, because smoking is hard to give up. To ban smoking in an efficient way we need the support of smokers, to gain it we should educate smokers. Also in developing education programs we should consider that weaker sections of the population tend to smoke more. To encourage people quit, for example, government should create a strong image of a cool non-smoker person and to advertise it. Moreover, create social non-smokers events like running marathon and of course open a free quit smoke workshops.
In conclusion, smoking is a very unpleasant habit for most of us and should be banned. But society should encourage smokers to quit and manage a healthy lifestyle. In edition a younger generation should be raise on a new culture of non-smokers, cool and modern people. Lastly, a regulations should be applied on tobacco companies and on representation of smoking in media.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 62, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an efficient way" with adverb for "efficient"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...king is hard to give up. To ban smoking in an efficient way we need the support of smokers, to gain...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 207, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'raised'?
Suggestion: raised
... edition a younger generation should be raise on a new culture of non-smokers, cool a...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 278, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a regulation' or simply 'regulations'?
Suggestion: a regulation; regulations
...mokers, cool and modern people. Lastly, a regulations should be applied on tobacco companies ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, lastly, moreover, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, of course

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1349.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16858237548 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77580852379 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.597701149425 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 412.2 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.3353650876 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.3125 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3125 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302126909436 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105716287012 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.054186350854 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192261091549 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0720268563789 0.056905535591 127% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.