Smoking not only harms smokers, but also those who are nearby. Therefore, smoking should be banned in public places. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Scientists claim that smoking not only leads to health problems for smokers, but also for those who breathe smoke of others’ cigarette. As a consequence, smoking should not be allowed in public. I strongly advocate a ban as the most appropriate course of action.
To begin with, no benefit has been discovered in smoking yet. Many wonder what the fundamental reason of this action is. To explain more, human basic needs such as food, a place to live, proper clothing and starting a family are completely understandable. However, there is no compulsory evidence that proves using cigarette is a necessity of life. Based on scientific researches conducted in recent years, the main reason of this vice of modern life is nothing but an illusion. As a matter of fact, smokers falsely believe that when they smoke, it gives them a relief; however, it is just in their mind and is considered only about a bad habit, not more.
Furthermore, this phenomenon is not without effects on both smokers and passive smokers. Passive smokers are ones who breathe the smoke of other people’s cigarette, which this can result in irreversible physical repercussions on both aforementioned groups. Lungs problems and heart diseases among them are obvious examples. In addition, most specialists are of the opinion that smoking note only have bad effects on body, but also on the mind and the way of thinking. Based on a study carried out in the UK in 2019, which corroborates the above information, over 85% of people who had been smoking for over ten years, were suffering from various illnesses. This study revealed that the smoking rate in society, particularly among the youth, has escalated greatly.
In conclusion, although a ban might seem too harsh, it, indeed, will prevent so many physical and mental risks for both smokers and passive ones.
- In 1975 a wildlife census found that there were seven species of amphibians in Xanadu National Park with abundant numbers of each species However in 2002 only four species of amphibians were observed in the park and the numbers of each species were drasti 83
- In developing countries tourism can have negative effects on their local environment and culture so it should be banned To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
- In many countries people now wear western style dress such as suits and jeans rather than traditional clothing Why is that Is this a positive or negative development 67
- You are going to visit the town that your friend went to university Write a letter to your friend In your letter explain why you will be visiting the town give details of where you will be staying as your friend to recommend some evening entertainment 70
- You ordered an item from and online store and it has arrived damaged Write a letter to the retailer to complain In the letter Explain why you are unhappy Request a refund Make arrangements to return the damaged item 64
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 63, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun wonder seems to be countable; consider using: 'Many wonders'.
Suggestion: Many wonders
...fit has been discovered in smoking yet. Many wonder what the fundamental reason of this act...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a matter of fact, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1539.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02941176471 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75999111266 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611111111111 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3848601905 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.1875 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.125 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261404838998 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0781538824877 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0768672425019 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154034856684 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100115751491 0.056905535591 176% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.