People around the world follow different techniques to raise children. However, irrespective of the backgrounds, strict adherence to the guidelines prescribed by child psychologists and pedagogy experts are must. In this essay we will discuss various theories in popular with examples for knowing best upbringing methods.
Few Asian Countries, like India, are known for strict upbringing of children where certain values of tradition are passed down through generation. This is classic example of Authoritarian parenting, according to leading psychology author paige, where kids are disciplined in patriarchal style which is not conducive for millennial generations. That being said, they are not bad for teaching some moral values and inculcate good habits. In contrast, we have cognitive development model where certain liberties are allowed for cognitve growth as name suggests. In this school, till certain age, parents only guide their kids rather than mandating them to walk in certain path. It is true, mostly followed by western countries, there is positive growth in child analogical skills as boundaries are bit flexible. Whereas, one should be careful as kids often try to cross their limits.
Finally we have another theory known as Affectionate parenting, suggested by Christopher Sara, which has cross techniques of both approaches. For instance, a toddler who has no interest in going to regular convents will be encouraged to take home tutoring. Thus along by side of learning, considerate importance given to child request. Similarly, proponents of this method, argue that kids and parents being affectionate to each other is secret of raising healthy adult. Another significant aspect is, rules and regulations are framed in more democratic approach unlike totalitarian nurturing. In other words, children has a say on rules imposed on them. As surprising it seems, this formula is now being implemented all around world.
In a nutshell, for brilliant career of our kids, modus operandi should be intermediary approach. In this manner, child will be following only those rules which make them good citizen and not a person who has tendency of sociopath. Afterall, today's children are tomorrow citizen's.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 297, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ies in popular with examples for knowing best upbringing methods. Few Asian Co...
^^
Line 3, column 797, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'bitten'.
Suggestion: bitten
...ild analogical skills as boundaries are bit flexible. Whereas, one should be carefu...
^^^
Line 3, column 811, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... skills as boundaries are bit flexible. Whereas, one should be careful as kids often tr...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...ids often try to cross their limits. Finally we have another theory known as Affecti...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 258, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ll be encouraged to take home tutoring. Thus along by side of learning, considerate ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 232, Rule ID: AFTERALL[1]
Message: Did you mean 'after all'?
Suggestion: After all
...a person who has tendency of sociopath. Afterall, todays children are tomorrow citizens....
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, similarly, so, thus, whereas, for instance, in contrast, in other words, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1890.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52631578947 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86714954143 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640350877193 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 573.3 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.060626064 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.5 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163511079639 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0478045952963 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.040168631174 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0963300060216 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0112282007923 0.056905535591 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.