In Some countries, fast food restaurants and companies give money to schools provided that the schools promote their products to school children.What do you think is the positive and negative of this in the development of children.

Essay topics:

In Some countries, fast food restaurants and companies give money to schools provided that the schools promote their products to school children.
What do you think is the positive and negative of this in the development of children.

In some nations, many eatable items and products related to students are widely advertised by school authorities, and schools are paid for it by product owners. Consumption of junk food could be harmful for children, whereas products related to their studies could be helpful for them. In this essay, I will discuss the pros and cons of it in the development of children.

First of all, start with positive side, some companies provides a good study material to school children which help them to learn quickly. Additionally, they provides different variety of food items, which is generally loved by school children. Moreover, they also provides latest publication books at discounted prices. For instance, many book sellers advertise their books to school children via school authorities and schools get paid for it. Schools use this money to provide better facilities to students. Hence, school children gets benefit of this money collected from marketers.

On the other hand, there are many negative effects on school children of marketing of junk food. Eating junk food could be unhealthy for children. Moreover, the quality of junk food provides in schools is not up to the mark. Due to the bad quality, children have to face many health related issues, which could cause illness among them. Many restaurants force school authorities to advertise their unhealthy products among school children by paying marketing fees. To exemplify, many children got sick after having mid day meals provided in government schools last year.

To conclude, I would say that there many advantages of promoting food products in schools by authorities, but meals should be safe and approved by governing bodies. Another point to consider, government should create some regulations to sell meals and allow companies to offer study material to poor students.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-06-10 rohit1234 67 view
2019-04-12 deeps123 73 view
Essays by user rohit1234 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 159, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'provide'
Suggestion: provide
...em to learn quickly. Additionally, they provides different variety of food items, which ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 266, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'provides the latest'.
Suggestion: provides the latest
...by school children. Moreover, they also provides latest publication books at discounted prices....
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 266, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'provide'
Suggestion: provide
...by school children. Moreover, they also provides latest publication books at discounted ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 272, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun health seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much health', 'a good deal of health'.
Suggestion: much health; a good deal of health
... the bad quality, children have to face many health related issues, which could cause illne...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, moreover, so, whereas, for instance, first of all, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1560.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30612244898 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62273792491 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547619047619 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.6794222207 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.7647058824 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2941176471 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.70588235294 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.472034104122 0.244688304435 193% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.171931781291 0.084324248473 204% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0810636617522 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.283259322134 0.151304729494 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105423920605 0.056905535591 185% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.22 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.