Some people believe that it is a good idea to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Many people think that it is completely fine sharing details related to technological investigation, trade and the education system with outside world. However, others feel that only trivial facts should be shared openly. In my opinion, basic details related to some particular areas can be shared with public but, the key facts should not be published publicly. In this essay, I will provide further examples and reasons.
First of all, general information which has not much significance for that particular technology research, business, and education system might be shared with outside world, because it has no confidential information. Information about a research carried out on an animal, for instance, details of outcome can be shared, but steps of investigation should be kept confidential. Because, if we share the procedure of investigation with common people then they could try it on humans which can be dangerous.
On the other hand, many argue that the confidential information should not be leaked, because it contains vital facts related to the specific technological research, business deals, and academic world. For example, the announcements related to a nuclear plant setup, government could tell about the start date and completion date of the nuclear plant construction, but keep the location confidential and secured. Because, if they share the location details freely, there is possibility that terrorists may attack the site. Additionally, if anyone leak critical information then someone else could copy research ideas which would be a huge financial loss.
Also, there are many other reasons, which could be responsible for keeping the information secret. Some factual data contains user’s personal information, which should not be shared with outside people, if it is shared freely, it will be against the code of ethics of any organization. Similarly, user’s information which is not important, can be shared with public for their knowledge.
In conclusion, the important information should not be shared freely due to criticality and keep it as confidential whereas, details which has less significance, can be shared with outside world because it does not contain any important information.
- You are planning a two week vacation and you need someone to take care o f your house while you are away Write a letter to your neighbor 1 In your letter tell your neighbor that you are going away ask your neighbor to take care of your house for you expla 91
- In Some countries, fast food restaurants and companies give money to schools provided that the schools promote their products to school children.What do you think is the positive and negative of this in the development of children. 67
- Your local council has decided to close the only park in your town and build a car park in its place. You believe this will have a bad effect on the people who live and work in the town.Write a letter to the mayor. In your letterintroduce yourselfexplain 89
- Some people say that in all levels of education, from primary schools to universities, too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skills.Do you agree or disagree? 78
- Parents should not pressure their children to choose a particular profession. Young people should have the freedom to choose a career path they like.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 548, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'anyone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'leaks'.
Suggestion: leaks
...ttack the site. Additionally, if anyone leak critical information then someone else ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, similarly, so, then, whereas, for example, for instance, in conclusion, first of all, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 7.85571142285 255% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 8.3376753507 288% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1905.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55393586006 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02455898582 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516034985423 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 583.2 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.4042482001 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.0 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8666666667 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2666666667 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274575289664 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10748852107 0.084324248473 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0509659135051 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176431159689 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0141067661519 0.056905535591 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.21 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.