In some countries, a few people earn extremely high salaries. Some people think that this is good for a country, while others believe that the government should control salaries and limit the amount people can earn.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
There are certain individuals who hold the view that the ruling administration should limit the emoluments of the people and put an end to the exorbitant wages withdrawn by them, while the others oppose it and consider it a regressive idea which will hamper country's progress. Both the above views have their own pros and cons which are further elaborated.
If the government forestalls the salaries of the employees after a certain earning limit then it can lead to a major problem of people migrating to other countries where such restrictions are not imposed called brain drain. This can cause a nation to loose a lot of its outstanding citizens which is all in all a great loss to the nation. Not only this, it even deteriorates the motivation of employees to work hard or make an extra effort at work, since they are aware that they won't be paid anything for pushing themselves harder.
On the other hand, the restriction on the maximum amount an individual can earn help in solving the problem of the income gap that exist in the country. For example in India top 1% have 70% of the country's wealth, which shows that the flow of money from top to bottom is marginal and income gap does indeed plays a major role in this. Apart from this, if we look at the current scenario money has become the most prominent thing and everyone is running after that, if there is a limit on the income a person can earn there is a possibility that the people can get involved in other recreational activities, sports etc.
Thus to conclude, it can be seen both the sides does have its own merits and demerits but in my view it is upon every nation to evaluate their circumstances and come up with their own set of rules and regulations as per requirement.
- It is often said that governments spend too much money on projects to protect wildlife, while there are other problems that are more important?Do you agree or disagree? 73
- Some employers want to be able to contact their staff at all times, even on holidays.Does this development have more advantages than disadvantages? (Reported 2017, GT Test) 100
- Having more money and less free time is better than earning less money and having more free time.Discuss both views and state your opinion. (Reported 2017, GT Test) 56
- The prevention of health problems and illness is more important than treatment and medicine. Government funding should reflect this.To what extent do you agree? 56
- In some countries, a few people earn extremely high salaries. Some people think that this is good for a country, while others believe that the government should control salaries and limit the amount people can earn.Discuss both views and give your opinio 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 252, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[3]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...brain drain. This can cause a nation to loose a lot of its outstanding citizens which...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 178, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in the country. For example in India top 1% have 70% of the countrys wealth, whic...
^^
Line 5, column 309, Rule ID: DOES_X_HAS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'play'? As 'do' is already inflected, the verb cannot also be inflected.
Suggestion: play
... is marginal and income gap does indeed plays a major role in this. Apart from this, ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 620, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...her recreational activities, sports etc. Thus to conclude, it can be seen both th...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ecreational activities, sports etc. Thus to conclude, it can be seen both the si...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, so, then, thus, while, apart from, for example, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1440.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58598726115 5.12529762239 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55748149372 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579617834395 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 20.2975951904 168% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.3605385535 49.4020404114 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.0 106.682146367 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.8888888889 20.7667163134 168% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2222222222 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230538684823 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0889893036478 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0601270125291 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123395326681 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0494984196193 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.89 50.2224549098 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 12.4159519038 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.1190380762 154% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.