In some countries, a few people earn extremely high salaries. Some people think that this is good for a country, while others believe that the government should control salaries and limit the amount people can earn.Discuss both views and give your opinion

With the development of society, people’s income has been increasing day by day. Some people think that the high-income level should be restricted by government, while others hold the point that it is good for the country. As far as I am concerned, the second view may be true.

First of all, one of the main benefits of the high salaries is attracting talent easily. For example, some famous companies such as Google and Facebook can offer an excellent salary package, it does not only attract the most talented people but also retain them working for a long time. In addition, these well-paid employees are likely to be highly motivated to work hard and create more value back. Also, the high-salary means government will receive more tax which benefits everyone.

On the other hand, there are various aspects against these arguments. One is that it will widen the gap between the rich and the poor which is a potential danger in the future social development. In addition, the widening gap could cause society to be unstable. For instance, the crime rate will rise because people who earn low-income feel that situation is unfair. But the best way to solve this problem is increasing the minimum income rather than limit the people to earn a high salary. The government can narrow the wealth gap through reasonable tax policy and minimum wage standard.

As discussed above, I think that it is unreasonable to limit the people who earn extremely high salaries. To be honest, high-income groups make more contribution to our country which promotes social development.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, may, second, so, well, while, for example, for instance, i think, in addition, such as, first of all, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 41.998997996 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1321.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00378787879 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63884146446 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.628787878788 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.8377829586 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.0666666667 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.13333333333 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335637244381 0.244688304435 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101460031417 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110836966368 0.0667982634062 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198221616241 0.151304729494 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0425503840649 0.056905535591 75% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.