In some countries, the number of shootings increase because many people have guns at home. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Nowadays, the rate of public shootings are increasing when comparing with the statistics of last decade.Because most of the developed countries are providing licensed arms for their citizens safety. I opine that, these crimes are increasing because every individual possess their own gun at home.

To begin with, certain demographics are unable to control their emotions, when they feel stress under any circumstances they were committing crimes by killing innocent people using their licensed weapons. For instance, last year, two people had fight in the bar, one among them bought his gun and shot in the bar, two were killed and one was hospitalized. Here, one person mental condition is cost of two lives, these people are unable to balance their pressure and provoked by their arms. And, media is also playing vital role by procrastinating negative news in their mode of channel, few people are getting fascinated by this and trying to become popular.

Furthermore, racism is also one of the finest reasons for gunning. Few citizens of metropolitan countries considers that the immigrants are grabbing their opportunities and making them sit idle. Some governing bodies also adding fuel to this perception ultimately it leads to adverse ramifications. In addition to this, Burglars, who are unable to meet their both ends, started using their own arms for blackmailing trespassers, if they revolt burglar might kill them. Because they are easily accessible with guns.

To sum up, by reviewing all above scenarios, people are owning their weapons with general body approval they were misusing it without second thinking. Here, the government intention is safety of their society , but it is not serving its purpose. In my perception, these public shooting, firing, gunning are happening only because people possess guns at home.So, the government should take preventive measures in restricting the arms usage.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 105, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Because
...ring with the statistics of last decade.Because most of the developed countries are pro...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 148, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ircumstances they were committing crimes by killing innocent people using their l...
^^
Line 5, column 470, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...if they revolt burglar might kill them. Because they are easily accessible with guns. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 53, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...y reviewing all above scenarios, people are owning their weapons with general body approva...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 209, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ent intention is safety of their society , but it is not serving its purpose. In m...
^^
Line 7, column 359, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: So
...nly because people possess guns at home.So, the government should take preventive ...
^^
Line 7, column 429, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'arms'' or 'arm's'?
Suggestion: arms'; arm's
... preventive measures in restricting the arms usage.
^^^^
Line 7, column 441, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...measures in restricting the arms usage.
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, second, so, for instance, in addition, to begin with, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1624.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37748344371 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77569332197 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62582781457 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8102115299 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.0 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5714285714 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110924259748 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0429604286494 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462057730975 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0811536267377 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0436665157757 0.056905535591 77% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.