Some parents believe that learning mathematics at school is redundant and should not be taught while others believe that it should remain a foundational subject whether or not it is used later in life. Discuss both sides.

Essay topics:

Some parents believe that learning mathematics at school is redundant and should not be taught while others believe that it should remain a foundational subject whether or not it is used later in life. Discuss both sides.

Nowadays, teaching and learning mathematics is becoming an increasingly controversial topic. It is commonly believed by some that learning mathematics is an obsolete while some says that it is mandatory to learn the same. This essay will discuss both sides of the argument in-depth.

On the one hand, most parents believe that teaching mathematics should be removed as they consider it’s not so relevant. Since, during college times a student would choose the subject as per their interest. Take for example, a medical student may not necessarily need to know extensive mathematics and a student who has passion in doing law doesn’t need to have a solid mathematics background. Therefore, many parents consider to remove the subjects that are no longer relevant especially mathematics.

On the other hand, some other says that mathematics lays a strong base in future. Because, learning mathematics s not just about learning formulas and equations, in other words, in our real world scenarios we would need it many cases. For instance, we would certainly need to be good at maths and calculations if we go to any shop to buy something. Moreover, mathematics keeps humans brain’s very sharp as students dealt with lot of complex equations. Thus, many believe that mathematics must be taught whether or not how relevant it is for future.

To conclude, many parents consider that mathematics should not be taught, while other feel that it is so important to learn. This essay discussed both views on why not many parents doesn’t wish to have students taught mathematics but while other have their strong opinions to include the same irrespective of whether maths used in future.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-05-05 arezooch1 62 view
2020-01-03 philony 67 view
2019-08-24 noora.qureshi 73 view
2019-05-08 santhosh666 73 view
2019-04-04 abed.joy 73 view
Essays by user santhosh666 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 429, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[3]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'consider removing'.
Suggestion: consider removing
...ics background. Therefore, many parents consider to remove the subjects that are no longer relevan...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 72, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ays that mathematics lays a strong base in future. Because, learning mathematics s not ju...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 509, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...believe that mathematics must be taught whether or not how relevant it is for future. To co...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 334, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...same irrespective of whether maths used in future.
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, in other words, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1431.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22262773723 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88858641601 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56204379562 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2889889952 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.214285714 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5714285714 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.343157397505 0.244688304435 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119627246693 0.084324248473 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0850228531268 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213208233151 0.151304729494 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0565256560384 0.056905535591 99% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.