As far as immigration of people and their successive assimilation into the host country's culture is concerned, there are two contrasting viewpoints. The first stance is that of the hardliners who are of the school of thought that all immigrants must adopt the host culture, whereas, the other view is more moderate in nature and is in the favour of letting the immigrants set up a small community of their own. This essay advocates the latter viewpoint after discussing the salient features of them both.
The first argument of forcing the local culture upon a set of migrants is not only medieval in nature but is also an infringement upon their human rights, it can be argued. This school of thought mainly stems from the false belief of utmost superiority of one's own culture and relative disrespect of other faiths and practices. History has countless examples of this phenomenon - the foremost one that comes to mind is that of Venetian sailors being forced to offer prayers to 'Allah' as a prerequisite if they wanted to anchor their ships for supplies and trade at the ports of Arabia during the middle ages.
The second school of thought of letting a foreign group of migrants establish their small community in the land of the host country is more liberal, modern, and humane. Such a viewpoint upholds personal freedom and the right to practice one's faith and shows respect towards other communities as much as one respects his own culture. The United Sates of America is a living example of such a viewpoint of human liberty and self-respect where one would find many communities living together in harmony while sharing the best practices of their cultures among one another. Needless to say, this not only strengthens communal bonds but is also vital in building a nation so great that portrays unity in diversity.
In conclusion, it is clear to state that migrants must be allowed to form their minor community in the host nation, for such a policy is fundamental to the fraternity, brotherhood, unity, and progress of a modern nation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 238, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...sonal freedom and the right to practice ones faith and shows respect towards other c...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, then, whereas, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1707.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 348.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90517241379 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66508609355 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560344827586 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.179530153 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.181818182 106.682146367 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.6363636364 20.7667163134 152% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.27272727273 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102420822262 0.244688304435 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0401417315913 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0446480956766 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0638607090216 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0601888617599 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.79 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.