Some people argue that immigrants should adopt the local culture when immigrating to a new country. An alternative view is that they can adapt to a new environment by establishing a minor community. Discuss these two views and give your opinion.

Essay topics:

Some people argue that immigrants should adopt the local culture when immigrating to a new country. An alternative view is that they can adapt to a new environment by establishing a minor community. Discuss these two views and give your opinion.

The culture of a person always describes his traits, personality and nationality. Immigrating to the other city somewhere makes necessary for a person to adopt the culture as it will help other people to understand him.

It is good to be independent but living solitary life or in minority communities can lead to adjustment issues. While moving to another country, in addition to culture understanding of multiple things like local language, dressing sense etc. is required. For instance, if we do not know the local language, it would be very difficult for us to adjust to the local culture. If we commute to Netherlands, first thing employer ask is, “do you know Dutch”. Because a good relation between clients and employer remains if an employee is able to understand clients words and requirements.

If we do not know the culture, then it is difficult to improve social connectivity within the area. It is always preferable to have a good connection with the people. Having helping hand at the foreign place can make life easier. In contrast, living within minority group can never be a good judgement. Having bad networking in an alien city can impact in certain manners like unable to take any help from others or remains in an odd one out situation while being in a minority group. People living outside your community finds difficult to understand the immigrant, which leads to misleading communications or adjustment issues.

To conclude, there is a difference between accepting the culture and understanding the culture. It is good to behave like one of them but leaving own religion is not a good intellect. If we want to walk far then walk together but for this, it is good to be better rather than being same.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Comments

Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'if', 'so', 'then', 'while', 'for instance', 'in addition', 'in contrast', 'you know']

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.210365853659 0.247107183377 85% => OK
Verbs: 0.182926829268 0.155533422707 118% => OK
Adjectives: 0.103658536585 0.0946595960268 110% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0396341463415 0.0501214627716 79% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0518292682927 0.0437548338989 118% => OK
Prepositions: 0.109756097561 0.122226691241 90% => OK
Participles: 0.0457317073171 0.0403226058552 113% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.87777878495 2.80594681477 103% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0609756097561 0.0326793684256 187% => Less infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0792682926829 0.0861772015684 92% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0182926829268 0.021408717616 85% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0030487804878 0.011925033212 26% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'

Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1743.0 1933.35771543 90% => OK
No of words: 293.0 316.048096192 93% => OK
Chars per words: 5.94880546075 6.12580529183 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20517956788 98% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.365187713311 0.374742101984 97% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.283276450512 0.28420135186 100% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.19795221843 0.203846283523 97% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.136518771331 0.137316102897 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87777878495 2.80594681477 103% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.037074148 91% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546075085324 0.56093040696 97% => OK
Word variations: 56.1218146751 60.7387585426 92% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0891783567 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.2352941176 20.7743622355 83% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4024220669 49.517814964 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.529411765 127.492653851 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2352941176 20.7743622355 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.588235294118 0.814263465372 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38877755511 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.99599198397 0% => OK
Readability: 45.5629391688 49.1944974215 93% => OK
Elegance: 1.33333333333 1.69124875643 79% => OK

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258319932057 0.332605444948 78% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0906663840396 0.102741220458 88% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0631942348905 0.0668466124924 95% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.482594835811 0.534860350844 90% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.142567156531 0.148594505496 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103844022913 0.134430193775 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0479699299114 0.0742795772207 65% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.326124840929 0.324371583561 101% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0645535215397 0.0638462369009 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185385505076 0.228012699653 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0184198880589 0.058150111329 32% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.

Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.68436873747 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.41683366733 88% => OK
Positive topic words: 10.0 5.90881763527 169% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 2.5751503006 116% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 1.9629258517 51% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 10.4468937876 134% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.