Some people believe that educating children altogether will benefit them.Others think intelligent children should be taught separately and given specialcourses. Discuss those two views

Essay topics:

Some people believe that educating children altogether will benefit them.

Others think intelligent children should be taught separately and given special

courses. Discuss those two views

In recent decades, children education has been given higher weight by the general

public. Some people believe that it is crucial, beneficial to gather talented

students and offer them special courses. However, as every coin has two sides,

the pros and cons of this educational philosophy will be discussed in the

following essay.

On the one hand, it is not surprising that arranging gifted children with special

classes and giving special instruction would bring tremendous interests to

producing élite students. The nutrient environment which promotes geniuses’

progress toward success could be provided by this teaching method. In stark

contrast, when learning through the ordinary curriculum, the personal development

of prodigies are usually hampered. In this effort, talented children could facilitate

their learning progress by exchanging knowledge and experience with their same

peers.

On the other hand, this teaching method has some drawbacks that should be taken

into consideration. In particular, it would foster depression, frustration amongst

slow students. Treating differently can drive ordinary students to feel a sense of

elimination and worthlessness. As a consequence, low-achievers could cast doubt

on their effort which leads to the lower performance and the lower record in

school. Furthermore, this arrangement can twist children’s perception of their

ability and potentially cause negative effects on their life afterwards.

In conclusion, it is a dilemma to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of

teaching separately, differently intelligent students. Although this way can bring a

nutritious environment to the personal development of high-achievers, the feeling

of discrimination and other detrimental results should be taken into account

educators seriously.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-11-20 jdsmss 67 view
Essays by user jdsmss :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Public
...en given higher weight by the general public. Some people believe that it is crucial...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Students
...rucial, beneficial to gather talented students and offer them special courses. However...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Following
...l philosophy will be discussed in the following essay. On the one hand, it is not sur...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 15, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Producing
...n would bring tremendous interests to producing élite students. The nutrient environmen...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Of
... curriculum, the personal development of prodigies are usually hampered. In this...
^^
Line 25, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Peers
...wledge and experience with their same peers. On the other hand, this teaching met...
^^^^^
Line 29, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Into
...s some drawbacks that should be taken into consideration. In particular, it would ...
^^^^
Line 31, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Slow
...oster depression, frustration amongst slow students. Treating differently can driv...
^^^^
Line 33, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Elimination
... ordinary students to feel a sense of elimination and worthlessness. As a consequence, lo...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 37, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: School
...r performance and the lower record in school. Furthermore, this arrangement can twis...
^^^^^^
Line 39, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Ability
...t children's perception of their ability and potentially cause negative effects ...
^^^^^^^
Line 43, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Teaching
...e the advantages and disadvantages of teaching separately, differently intelligent stu...
^^^^^^^^
Line 43, column 56, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...tely, differently intelligent students. Although this way can bring a nutritious envir...
^^^^^^^^
Line 49, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Educators
... results should be taken into account educators seriously.
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, so, in conclusion, in particular, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1618.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.22307692308 5.12529762239 121% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2438631181 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.619230769231 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.1327656823 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.571428571 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5714285714 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 23.0 4.38176352705 525% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 14.0 5.01903807615 279% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183110816359 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0572770347944 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0529102282127 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0464553422664 0.151304729494 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0536837436025 0.056905535591 94% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.8 12.4159519038 151% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.06 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.