Some people believe that government money should be spent on important things rather than arts such as painting and music. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Concerning the issue that government budget are being spent to various areas. It is believed that government should place their budget in other important fields rather than arts. In fact, a deeper look into its features convinces me that arts has its own unique values and government funds should be supported for its developement. Following are further explanations to my rendered opinion.
In the first place, among the numerous reasons for the thesis statement above, the most remarkable one is that some essential areas which have not yet met the certain level of public satisfaction. This is due to the fact that budget for these fields is in short-fall status. For example, people keep continuously complaining about weak health care system, poor public school’s quality and frail police forces to deal with criminals...etc. Therefore, it is reasonable to say that the government should contribute more generously to top hot fields but not arts.
The second reason why this issue is supported upon is that government-sponsored programs usually limit the creative of artists’ works. By using government financial support, artists should comply and follow government requirements and needs which definitely limit creativity of artists’ works. Moreover, government normally commission a work of art which are sometimes sheer political propaganda. Obviously, those kind of works which is merely a waste of money, do not benefit to people.
Taking everything into account, the above mentioned discussions have led to a confirmation that arts is not the right area that governments money should spend on. The thought-provoking nature of this issue should need further consideration, more academically and thoroughly.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-02 | Andy Hoang | 61 | view |
| 2019-11-02 | Andy Hoang | 78 | view |
- Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favour of 80
- Topic: The growing number of overweight people is putting a strain in the health care system in an effort to deal with the health issues involved. Some people think that the best way to deal with this problem is to introduce more physical education lesson 89
- Topic: There are many different types of music in the world today. Why do we need music?Is the traditional music of a country more important than the international music that is heard everywhere nowadays? 84
- Some people believe that government money should be spent on important things rather than arts such as painting and music. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Despite huge improvements in healthcare, the overall standard of physical health in many developed countries is now falling. What could be the reason for this trend, and what can be done to reverse it? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 415, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'dealing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'force' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: dealing
...'s quality and frail police forces to deal with criminals...etc. Therefore, it is ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 419, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'those kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; those kinds
... sheer political propaganda. Obviously, those kind of works which is merely a waste of mon...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 129, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...on that arts is not the right area that governments money should spend on. The thought-prov...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, look, moreover, second, so, therefore, for example, in fact, in short, kind of, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1482.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.59245283019 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18729231867 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641509433962 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8546466192 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.857142857 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9285714286 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205398677924 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0681034026864 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0594954283129 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118169234013 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0595672128262 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.