Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
People have different views about how much confidential information should be shared publicly in the field of science, business and education. However, I believe that it could be harmful because of several grounds.
At the outset, some people assert that the availability of information can save human efforts. From the education perspective, students can carry on their assignments and project work by reading various academic texts through the internet and this thorough knowledge can be advantageous for their course work and career. In the case of science, various researchers can follow the research work of other scientists for further development and discoveries. If they do not have any access to previous resources, they would have to start from scratch. From the business perspective, various management, organisational and marketing strategies could be learnt from the bibliographies and interviews of top top-notch professionals. The book 'Rich Dad Poor Dad' of Robert T. Kiyosaki is a good example of it, that has converted ordinary people into renowned entrepreneurs.
On the other hand, the circulation of free information can be detrimental because of various grounds. Firstly, the leaking of secret information could demolish the existing organisations. For instance, KFC and McDonalds have a monopoly in their fields because of their recipes. Secondly, scientific information in wrong hand can bring the whole planet on the verge of extinction. Notorious culprits, for instance, can make the atomic and nuclear bombs by having access to sensitive information. The third negative would be for the pupils, who can publish the pirated contents under their names. if no access is given to them to the thesis work of others, they would have to brainstorm and devise their ideas in their majors. Thus, I argue that the information should be protected from leakage.
In conclusion, while people argue that the sharing of information has certain positives, its several drawbacks are the main causes of my disagreement.
- Some people believe that technology has made man more social. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 89
- SOME PEOPLE CLAIM THAT NOT ENOUGH OF THE WASTE FROM HOMES IS RECYCLED. THEY SAY THAT THE ONLY WAY TO INCREASE RECYCLING IS FOR GOVERNMENTS TO MAKE IT A LEGAL REQUIREMENT. TO WHAT EXTEND DO YOU THINK LAWS ARE NEEDED TO MAKE PEOPLE RECYCLE MORE OF THEIR WAS 56
- Some people think that the museum should be enjoyable places to entertain people while others believe that that purpose of a museum is to educate. Discuss both views and opinion. 73
- One of your friends recently had a birthday celebration, but you missed it and you forget to tell your friend that you couldn't attend. Write a letter -explain why you missed it -explain why you didn't tell your friend -and say what you would li 73
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both views and give your o 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 753, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rofessionals. The book Rich Dad Poor Dad of Robert T. Kiyosaki is a good example ...
^^
Line 9, column 596, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...the pirated contents under their names. if no access is given to them to the thesi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, third, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1726.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46202531646 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03260337397 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572784810127 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.8240361515 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.8888888889 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5555555556 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192205204352 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0623079136114 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0579307653179 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136949792512 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0582411201042 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.09 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.