Some people believe that schools should teach students according to their academic abilities, while others believe that it is better to have students with different abilities study together.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
There is a widely-held view among people about whether students with different abilities should be taught in the same academic environment. While there has been a growing body in favor of providing distinct curriculums based on the ability to study, I am of the opinion that it would be better to teach all students together.
On the one hand, it is no doubt true that adopting distinct teaching tactics equipped with the appropriate pace and adequate knowledge for each group of pupils would boost the maximum benefits, allowing them to cope with the pace of studies and easily pass the exams with flying colors. This would act as a deterrent to prevent the students from enduring high pressure given by others, which might cause detrimental mental health problems, leading to stress and other life-threatening conditions if persisting in the long term.
On the other hand, if educational institutions provide classes for mixed-ability students in uniformity, a sense of competition between learners in a class will be developed, which motivationally pushes them towards the limits on the ground and reaches their potential. This would not only lead to an improvement in the level of academics but also grant them opportunities to achieve comprehensive personal development in multi-dimensional perspectives. For instance, an undergraduate who is exceptional at philosophical performance but lacking in terms of practical skills can learn from his classmates gradually after observing their behaviors daily.
In conclusion, it might seem sensible to me that even though streaming pupils into groups can bring advantages to some extent, it would be better if all students were taught using the same curriculum.
- Cars damage the environment and their use is increasing Why How can this be controlled 89
- People are consuming more and more sugar based drinks Why What can be done to reduce sugary drink consumption 67
- The advantage brought by the spread of English as a global language will outweigh the disadvantages To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view 89
- Some organisations believe that their employees should dress smartly Others value quality of work above appearance Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 78
- Some people say the government should give healthcare the first priority some others believe there are more important priorities to spend the taxpayers money Discuss both view and give your opinion 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, no doubt, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1447.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37918215613 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13224767946 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.661710037175 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 16.0721442886 50% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 20.2975951904 163% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.7520491344 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 180.875 106.682146367 170% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.625 20.7667163134 162% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.25 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235056320743 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0994064300508 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0812061493534 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140263133178 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0989679431775 0.056905535591 174% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.7 13.0946893788 158% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.98 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.52 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.26 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 9.78957915832 194% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.1190380762 150% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.