Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language. Do you think this is a positive or negative social development?
There is a view held among people that in the future, people will use the global language to interact with others. Personally, although there are significant factors that account for this development, however, I would argue that using the international language is a positive social development.
The downsides of this trend cannot be overlooked. Particularly, the dominance of one language will eliminate linguistic diversity in many countries all around the world, which, in other words, can trigger cultural assimilation. Languages not only are a method that human use to communicate with other people but also encompasses many aspects of societies, which can be referred to myths, traditional activities, and even rich historical heritages. Therefore, if the unity of common language happens, the young generation easily underestimates the value of their language as well as their traditional culture, which can damage their own hometown’s traditions and identities.
However, this tendency offers several practical benefits to society as a whole. First, using a global language will give countless opportunities for people to integrate into the global working environment, which can be claimed that is a necessary urgency, especially when globalization is a universal trend nowadays. Second, without the language barrier, people can be exposed to tremendous storage of information in their mother tongue in order to heighten their intellect, which undoubtedly acts as a stimulus to increase decent standards of living as well as many countries’ national economic expansions.
In conclusion, although there are some undeniable negative consequences of this trend, I still believe that using an international language is essential for human’s future social development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-26 | Yamin_j | 61 | view |
| 2021-11-20 | hieutrungpham7201 | 89 | view |
| 2021-11-12 | gianggiangvn | 84 | view |
| 2021-10-12 | quynhhuong656 | 89 | view |
| 2021-09-05 | miminguyen | 73 | view |
- Nowadays genetically modified food is widespread all over the world While proponents of GM crops ensure that these foods are safe for human consumption and help to increase food supplies others argue that their effects on health have not been studied long 89
- In many cities the use of video cameras in public places is becoming more popular but some people are against these measures Do the benefits of CCTV outweigh its drawbacks 78
- Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language Do you think this is a positive or negative social development 78
- Many women are choosing to have children later in life Why is this Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
- Some countries achieve international success by building specialized facilities to train top athletes instead of providing sports facilities that everyone can use Do you think it is a positive or negative development 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 271, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...guages not only are a method that human use to communicate with other people but al...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, second, so, still, therefore, well, in conclusion, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1520.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.75757575758 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17325688034 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.602272727273 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.5474667616 49.4020404114 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.0 106.682146367 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4 7.06120827912 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168295974211 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0730612041527 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0512577979231 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123711819863 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.05491724172 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 13.0946893788 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 50.2224549098 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.43 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.