Some people believe that students should be taught international news as a subject at school. Others feel that this would be a waste of valuable school time. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
A vast majority considered that the international media plays pivotal role in creating globalization. However, is it necessary to teach students regarding international news as subject in their curriculum, while some believe that they should. I disagree and opine that this is unproductive use of the precious school time.
On the one hand, teaching international news at school level have certain benefits. The first and foremost advantage is that it may enhance the general reading capabilities of the students. In other words, students who are taught international news at younger age may led them to become avid reader in the later part of their life, which eventually will help them in understanding the complex text. Furthermore, it may also enhance their understanding about the different terminology used in complex writings which they might not read in their text book, that contain very specific range of words. Another great benefit of teaching global news in academia is that Students may develop broader exposure about the key developments happening in the world. Hence, they can prepare their mind ahead of any natural calamity. Let’s take the example of children who followed the Covid19 precautionary measures through the WHO guidelines which are periodically published in international media, are already taking the necessary measures in order to save their own and their family lives.
However, there are arguments to suggest that teaching international news at school level can create obstacles for the children to focus on their core subjects. The primarily reason of this might be that students may focus too much on this specific subject while ignoring their core subjects which are essential for their future jobs. In addition, it may crate hindrance for those students who are often not fond of following global news. Thus, their overall academic results may suffer with the addition of international news in their curricula. Moreover, learning global media at younger age might create detrimental impact on children’s mind as the international news are always full with negative and adverse stories about the different parts of the world. So, teaching them in early years of their life may shape their attitude hostile.
In conclusion, although, getting familiar with the international news has certain gain for the children, but the negative sentiments which might be created can become destructive for their future. Therefore, on balance, I believe students should not be taught international news as the part of their subject.
- Some people believe that students should be taught international news as a subject at school Others feel that this would be a waste of valuable school time Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Some people believe that all children should learn a foreign language from the time they start school while others feel it is better to wait until a child is at secondary school Discuss both sides and give your own opinion 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 841, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... life may shape their attitude hostile. In conclusion, although, getting familia...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, thus, while, in addition, in conclusion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 7.30460921844 233% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2164.0 1615.20841683 134% => OK
No of words: 402.0 315.596192385 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38308457711 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47771567384 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84352188187 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519900497512 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 666.0 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.406578029 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.222222222 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211663948253 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0844539990002 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0826283831352 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171050616897 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.054042408401 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.