Some people claim that it is acceptable to use animals in medical research for the benefit of human beings, while others argue that it is wrong. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Recently there has being multiple debates regarding the use of animals for medical purposes. While some people might say that using these creatures for the benefit of science is wrong, I believe that both points of views must be considerated in order to find a mid term solution for the development of the medicine.
Although some medical researches do not follow proper regulation for their continuity and the pharmaceutical market takes advantage of animals to develop its products, there has many organs trying to inspect and audit this class. It is part of the government obligation to support these organs and penalize the companies that are not following the normative and rules according to the established law. Every organization that is taking advantage of animals without permission and in an indiscriminate way should pay several fees and have its research interrupted.
On the other hand, some other serious companies are trying to legalize medical researches in order to find the cure for deadly diseases and the treatment of their symptoms. On this case, it is fair to say that the animals are not being used without purpose, and the science needs to keep its development to make sure the future of the humankind is possible.
To sum up, I believe that all the animals used for medical research have their useful contribution to the universe and should not die without a cause. The humankind is becoming more powerfull and able to resist to several problems thanks to these beautiful creatures that have been used for the benefit of human beings, therefore, it is acceptable to give them purpose in life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 481, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an indiscriminate way" with adverb for "indiscriminate"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ntage of animals without permission and in an indiscriminate way should pay several fees and have its re...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, regarding, so, therefore, while, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1360.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03703703704 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72025376045 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533333333333 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.4034649949 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.111111111 106.682146367 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.0 20.7667163134 144% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.77777777778 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334447172516 0.244688304435 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127803294715 0.084324248473 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0744348978015 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196985752006 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0751041046955 0.056905535591 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 50.2224549098 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.