Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.
To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?
some people support the idea that recycling should be encouraged by a set of legislation. while I believe imposing laws to make recycling compulsory is necessary, I would argue that companies and individual should be responsible as well towards the environment.
On the one hand, there are some reasons why laws are effective to drive people to commit to the act of recycling. firstly, if there are fines, people tend to pay more attention to the issues. The fear of losing money will result in more careful behavior from both enterprises and individuals. Secondly, laws upon recycling would take an immediate and widespread effect within society. In many European countries, the ban on plastic bags used in supermarkets has a prodigiously positive impact on the community. people have opted to recycle their cloth bags to go groceries and get accustomed to the good habit.
On the other hand, responsibilities to recycle as much as possible should be conducted by companies and individuals without any hesitation and legal requirements. firstly, if firms are aware of the consequences of their actions, they should know how to adapt. For example, many restaurants and cafes across the globe have stopped using plastic straws and replaced them with alternatives made from environmentally friendly materials like bamboo, glass and steel. This contributes to the decreasing numbers of plastic straws globally last year. Additionally, people would also need to play our parts as smart consumers because there are no surveillance cameras that would follow us 24/7. For instance, reusable glasswares are getting more prevalent to take away foods instead of single-use containers.
In conclusion, some measures should be applied to companies and individuals by governments to ensure the application of recycling, while enhancing the awareness of benefits of recycling and negative effects of over-consuming culture in the community also plays a crucial part to protect the environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
some people support the idea that recycling ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 91, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
... be encouraged by a set of legislation. while I believe imposing laws to make recycli...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 115, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Firstly
...ople to commit to the act of recycling. firstly, if there are fines, people tend to pay...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 512, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
...ously positive impact on the community. people have opted to recycle their cloth bags ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 164, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Firstly
... any hesitation and legal requirements. firstly, if firms are aware of the consequences...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1685.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43548387097 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08003033892 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616129032258 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.7006065826 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.333333333 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226576226247 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0701238286707 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0420523538174 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132169615293 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0462188631725 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.