Some people say that children given pocket money every week will have lesser money problems when they become adults Do you agree or disagree

It has long been a subject of discussion whether young ones who get extra money by weekly face fewer obtacles in their future life or not. In my opinion, the former notion has several elements that deserve attention, and I will explain why using pertinent arguments.

Children with their pocket money are able to manage expenses. In their childhood age, they become familiar with the importance of money in life. According to a survey conducted by Stanford University 60% of kids who have pocket spare money able to spend on important things while 30% of other children face difficulties in managing expenses later in life. Moreover, kids aware about importance of money in early stages of life and use that knowledge in rest of the life.

As an illustration, academic research done by the Australian government that youngsters have money for personal use and become more independent as they spend their money wisely and fulfil their dreams.
As a result, they become confident in life which is highly beneficial for tackling issues related to money in future. Furthermore, they become familiar with the cost of things in the market. Hence, they become more stable and know how to handle cash and solve family problems with specific amounts of cash.

In conclusion, from what we have discussed above, I personally believe that it would be wise to say that having pocket money weekly assists children to boost self-esteem and solve problems related to managing expenses.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 108, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...al for tackling issues related to money in future. Furthermore, they become familiar with...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, if, moreover, so, while, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1236.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 244.0 315.596192385 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06557377049 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56552139474 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590163934426 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 392.4 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.4665970085 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.363636364 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1818181818 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.81818181818 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286177575546 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114006507023 0.084324248473 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0531203496637 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156782950108 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0446683950666 0.056905535591 78% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.