It has long been a subject of discussion whether young ones who get extra money by weekly face less obstacles in their future life or not. In my opinion, the former notion has several elements that deserve attention, and I will explain why using pertinent arguments.
Children with their pocket money are able to manage expenses. In their childhood age, they become familiar with the importance of money in life. According to a survey conducted by Stanford University 60% of kids who have pocket spare money able to spend on important things while 30 % of other children face difficulties in managing expenses.
As an illustration, academic research done by the Australian government that youngsters have money for personal use and become more independent as they spend their money wisely and fulfil their dreams.
As a result, they become confident in life which is highly beneficial for tackling issues related to money in future.
In conclusion, from what we have discussed above, I personally believe that having pocket money assists children to boost self-esteem and solve problems related to financial stability.
- Many doctors say that people in today s world do not do enough physical exercise What do you think are the causes of this What solutions are there to this problem
- Many offenders commit more crimes after serving the first punishment Why is this happening and what measures can be taken to tackle this problem 67
- Some people think that school children need to learn practical skills such as car maintenance or bank account management along with the academic subjects at school To what extent do you agree or disagree
- Some people believe that mobile phone conversations should be banned in crowded and social places Others disagree Discuss both views and give your own opinion 67
- Some people think it is better for people to change their careers at least once in their life and do different kinds of jobs Do you agree or disagree with this opinion 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 96, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun obstacles is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ones who get extra money by weekly face less obstacles in their future life or not. ...
^^^^
Line 6, column 108, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...al for tackling issues related to money in future. In conclusion, from what we have d...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 948.0 1615.20841683 59% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 180.0 315.596192385 57% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26666666667 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 4.20363070211 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71719874355 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 176.041082164 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.672222222222 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 297.9 506.74238477 59% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 16.0721442886 50% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.9794280796 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.5 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280826789476 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126005976715 0.084324248473 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0479454360585 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14805241082 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.042940572035 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 78.4519038076 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.