It is often argued by many that there is no need to go theatres for watching movies due to the advancements in mobile technology, but others say that it is more enjoyable to watch in cinemas. This essay will discuss both the viewpoints and present my opinion.
Going to movie theatres can be enjoyable only in some instances, such as when people have extra time and money to spend. People believe this as a better option because it shows movies on big curtains and has no side-effects on eyes. They think this because on hand-held devices people have to focus on smaller screens which put strain on eyesight and they believe in worst cases it can lead to operating as well. Take a report by the WHO as an example. This has revealed that 10 out of 100 children are suffering from eye-related problems as they do not blink eyes while watching content on phones. However, I think against it as proper care can be taken by the individuals and parents in order to overcome from its hazardous effects.
On the other hand, choosing an option to watch films on tablets is beneficial for everyone. Population can enjoy the latest shows with whole family without spending hefty amount at no or minimal cost. For instance, visit to a cinema needs money for fuel, tickets, and snacks which higher than the internet costs and this can be used for other purposes like for office work. In addition to this, mobile phones allow people to watch as per their convenience. They can even skip or leave in the middle if they do not like without being taken care of money spent. I believe this is a more preferable option as it has a facility to watch at any time and also can help in saving money which can be spent on other useful household tasks.
In conclusion, although people may vary in their opinions and argue that cinemas provide more benefits because of bigger screens, I believe mobile devices save hard-earned money and time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 365, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'in the worst'.
Suggestion: in the worst
...put strain on eyesight and they believe in worst cases it can lead to operating as well....
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 182, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...family without spending hefty amount at no or minimal cost. For instance, visit to...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, well, while, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1588.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6432748538 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39414233351 2.80592935109 85% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567251461988 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1778706891 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.866666667 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.2 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231646251663 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0723489495921 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0450363728974 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134387675471 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0484736083064 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 50.2224549098 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 12.4159519038 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.