Some people say that now we can see films on our own phones and tablets there is no need to go to cinema, others, say to be fully enjoyed films need to be seen in cinema. Discuss both the views and give opinion.
Nowadays, cinema has become a multi-million dollar industry. While there are some arguments about whether to watch films at home with technological devices or go to cinemas. I opine that the traditional way to watch films has its own magic, unlike the devices’ experience. This essay will elaborate on both points of view, along with my personal perspective.
On the one hand, the internet allows the audience to watch the latest cinema’s productions at almost free charge. In other words, if individuals have no budget for entertainment, they can afford convenient other methods to see films on phones or Ipads. In addition, busy people choose to stay home seeing movies, for this way does not consume time. This can be proven by a report published by the Time recently, which has manifested that about 57 percent of people prefer to utilize their devices to watch films for the reasons shown above.
On the other hand, the visual experience of the big screen is worth it. To illustrate, films have amazing features and visual effects that only can be felt by attending the cinema. Furthermore, cutting-edge techniques like vibration and 9D impacts are only available in cinemas’ halls, because of the high-quality screens and special movement seats. According to a questionnaire conducted by Monster.com, which has shown that the pleasure of watching science fiction and action movies on a big screen is double, and people often buy tickets for this kind of productions.
Having presented the ideas above, I have drowned the conclusion that two major factors affect people’s decisions about the cinema which are the ticket price and their free time. I want to reiterate my stance that watching films is more interesting and fun at the cinema.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, while, in addition, kind of, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1474.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11805555556 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78408138927 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611111111111 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5909249287 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.285714286 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5714285714 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92857142857 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228038407729 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0765423400348 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0483309804002 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133194786631 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0304457962534 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.