All cars that burn fossil fuels should be banned and electric cars should replace them. Do you agree or disagree?
In the present day, authorities should ban all vehicles that depend on oil and gas, and instead, they should support the electric cars industry to be a replacement. From my point of view, such a measure would make a vital change in people’s lives, for fossil fuels have been affecting the environment in negative ways. In addition, the cost of extraction is expensive, and people need an alternative for it.
To start with, fossil fuel emissions are one of the main causes of global warming. To illustrate, carbon dioxide ratio is increasing in the air because of the huge numbers of cars that burn fuels every minute, and this has a direct impact on people’s lives. Not only by pollution, but the high increase in temperature degrees causes death to people who live in cold regions, for their bodies are not used to hot weather. This can be exemplified by the heatwave the hits Europe about three years ago, and many elderly people had died or had breathing problems.
Furthermore, the need for an alternative is a crucial thing. People and governments have depended on fossil fuels for a long time, and the cost of extracting and processing raw oil is expensive. While the cost of production of an electric car is less, and the process is eco-friendly in contrast with extracting oil. This can be proven by a research study conducted by the faculty of oil engineering, Baghdad university, that has shown the economic and environmental negative impacts of extracting oil on the Iraqi people, despite the fact that the Iraqi economy is 90 percent depends on oil.
Having presented the ideas above, I have drowned the conclusion that replacing fossil fuels with electricity is a good choice. I want to reiterate my stance that burning fossil fuels causes environmental issues and economical problems.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In the present day, authorities should b...
^^
Line 5, column 215, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...l fuels causes environmental issues and economical problems.
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mental issues and economical problems.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, while, in addition, in contrast, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1510.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95081967213 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78887874699 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577049180328 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 0.809619238477 865% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.7607148099 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.153846154 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4615384615 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.23076923077 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222925431164 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0762888927381 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0827504377318 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13930133302 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0599817144983 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.