For some people shopping is not just about buying what is necessary, but a form of entertainment. Do you think it is a positive or a negative development?

Essay topics:

For some people shopping is not just about buying what is necessary, but a form of entertainment. Do you think it is a positive or a negative development?

There is a controversial issue about the necessity of purchasing as a sort of amusement. Some social workers think that it is a disadvantageous trend, while some businessmen believe that it is a beneficial development for the economy. In this essay, I will consider both points of view and agree with the idea of the positive effect.

Let us start with reasons why some social workers state that shopping for fun is a detrimental tendency. The first reason is that it is a wasteful type of pastime. People often spend too much money, when they go shopping as a leisure activity, because they both visit store frequently and buy unnecessary things, such as another smart phone or expensive dressing. Another reason is that growing generations concentrate on shopping at the expense of education. Students often shift their priority from study to shopping as recreational activity, since they tend to follow popular trends in society, which causes a detrimental impact on their academic performance. Therefore, it is reasonable to label shopping for entertainment as a negative development.

However, some entrepreneurs claim that this type of entertainment is a positive trend for community. They justify their opinion with the following arguments. Firstly, it significantly increases the trade turnover. Stores can sell and then refill more goods from supply, when people visit them more often for pleasure, so it enables customers to fully satisfy their needs as well as businessmen to make bigger profits. Secondly, it generates larger taxes. The more goods shops sell, the more income they generate as tax for the budget, which allows the government to allocate more funding for different social programs. As a result, it is rational to say that shopping for entertainment is a positive effect for the governmental welfare.

In conclusion, even though some social workers advocate that purchasing for amusement has many negative impacts on society, I think that it brings more economical advantages to the whole country for the above mentioned reasons.

Votes
Average: 9 (4 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-15 Kaupo199 73 view
2020-01-15 Kaupo199 73 view
2019-08-08 Tolik 90 view
2019-08-08 Tolik 73 view
2019-08-08 Tolik 73 view
Essays by user Tolik :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, while, i think, in conclusion, sort of, such as, as a result, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1737.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29573170732 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9657457834 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57012195122 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 553.5 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.7494888307 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.176470588 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2941176471 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.58823529412 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234855280511 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0710800220281 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0599432688498 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144601070198 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0154403045478 0.056905535591 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.