Some people say that advertising encourages us to buy things that we really do not need. Others say that advertisements tell us about new products that may improve our lives.
Which viewpoint do you agree with?
There is a controversial issue about the role of advertisement in society. Some social workers argue that it commonly causes people to buy superfluous items in stores, while merchandisers say that it can lead to an increase in quality of life. In this essay, I will discuss both points of view and agrees with the idea of life improvement.
Let us start with the reasons why some social workers state that advertising promotes unnecessary purchase of shop items. The first reason is that people are usually reluctant to unadvertised products. Many buyers purchase expensive items, which they have watched on TV before, but they ignore unfamiliar alternatives of approximate quality. Another reason is that people tend to relate success to advertised products. Students, for example, tend to demonstrate promoted IPhone to their peers to show their seemingly high social status, so others also want to acquire the same mobile phone no matter how much they overpay. Furthermore, advertising attracts casual purchasers. Shoppers, who intend to buy some basic products, such as milk and bread, may fall a victim of advertisement promoting peripheral goods.
However, some merchandisers claim that advertisement grows standards of living. They justify their viewpoint by the following arguments. Firstly, it enables shoppers to choose high-quality goods. It is often difficult to pick the best product among a wide range of analogous products, but after watching TV, for instance, they can do it easily. Secondly, it helps people to be aware of new merchandises. People usually overlook newly presented goods in the market, because they heavily rely on the old ones, but with the help of advertisement, they can shift their attention to newly presented items with better characteristics. Moreover, it shows what other people opt to buy. Shoppers, who are under confusion by the variety of products, may make their choice, as soon as they get to know what the majority prefers through TV.
In conclusion, although some social workers think that commercial induce people to make unwanted purchases, I believe that advertisement increases the quality of life by informing of better options in the market.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-04 | muhammad Junaid | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-20 | camp.vandna@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-20 | camp.vandna@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-15 | smiley | 61 | view |
| 2019-10-29 | Violet Osueke | 78 | view |
- You are currently taking a course at a college but you will need to have a week off during this course Write a letter to the college Principal In the letter give details of your course explain why you need a week off say what you want the Principal to do 73
- Some people believe that tourists should accept social and environmental responsibility. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- A serious problem affecting countries right across the globe is the lack of water for drinking washing and other household uses Why do many countries face water shortages and what could be done to alleviate the problem 84
- Violence in the media promotes violence in society. To what extent do you agree? 11
- What are the advantages and disadvantages of leaving your country to live or study abroad 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, look, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1857.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32091690544 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93157238233 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618911174785 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 572.4 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.0989430626 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.7368421053 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3684210526 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226870373077 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0666614153436 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0392133230065 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126473930298 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0299042830026 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.