For some people shopping is not just about buying what is necessary, but a form of entertainment. Do you think it is a positive or a negative development?

Essay topics:

For some people shopping is not just about buying what is necessary, but a form of entertainment. Do you think it is a positive or a negative development?

There is a controversial issue about the necessity of purchasing as a sort of amusement. Some social workers think that it is a disadvantageous trend, while some businessmen believe that it is a beneficial for the economy. In this essay, I will consider both points of view and agree with the idea of positive effects.

Let us start with reasons why some social workers state that shopping for fun is a detrimental tendency. The first reason is that it is a wasteful type of entertainment. People often spend much more, when they go shopping as a leisure activity, because they both visit store more frequently and buy unnecessary things, such as another smart phone or dressing. Another reason is that a growing generation concentrate on shopping at the expense of education. Students can shift their priority from study to shopping as entertainment, since they tend to follow popular trends in society, which causes a detrimental impact on their academic performance. Therefore, it is reasonable to label shopping for entertainment as a negative development.

However, some entrepreneurs claim that this type of entertainment is a beneficial for community. They justify their opinion with the following arguments. Firstly, it significantly increases the trade turnover. Stores can sell and then order more goods from supply, when people visit them more often for entertainment, so customers fully satisfy their needs, and businessmen make more profits. Secondly, it generates more taxes. The more goods stores sell, the more money they generate as tax, which allows the government to allocate more funding for different social programs. As a result, it is rational to say that shopping for entertainment is a positive effect for the governmental welfare.

In conclusion, even though some workers advocate that shopping for amusement has many negative impacts on society, I think that it brings more advantages for the economy for the above mentioned reasons.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-15 Kaupo199 73 view
2020-01-15 Kaupo199 73 view
2019-08-08 Tolik 90 view
2019-08-08 Tolik 73 view
2019-08-08 Tolik 73 view
Essays by user Tolik :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, while, i think, in conclusion, sort of, such as, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1658.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3141025641 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04785279178 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557692307692 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.7058823529 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5294117647 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3529411765 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.52941176471 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232727618981 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0735790750974 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0582297233658 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154581187518 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0301800340765 0.056905535591 53% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.