Some people spend most of their lives living close to where they were born What might be the reason for this What are the advantages and disadvantages

Essay topics:

Some people spend most of their lives living close to where they were born.
What might be the reason for this?
What are the advantages and disadvantages?

Living in the hometown is a dream of many people. Few individuals prefer to live at their birthplace because they do not find it comfortable to relocate far from their home. Let us discuss the reason behind it in forthcoming paragraphs along with the merits and demerits of staying in the local place.

To embark with, the major purpose of living in the hometown is taking care of the parents as few individuals do not want to leave their parents alone at the cost of fulfilling their own dreams. To explain this, old people do not wish to leave their homes to accompany their children due to which people have to stay near to their birth places. For example, in countries like India, where the value of relations is too high, people always support their parents and relatives.

First and foremost advantage of living near the place of birth is friendly surroundings that enables natives to enjoy their life the most. To clarify, they do not want to get separated from their close ones. In addition to this, most of the people get parental property, due to which they are not burdened to spend their earnings for a shelter. For example, a recent survey conducted by the National Sample Survey Office, New Delhi on three big cities of India revealed that seventy out of hundred people are successful who got inherent support in terms of house and land.

On the other hand, despite the benefits of it, a section of society faces few difficulties in settling in their locality. Primarily, less source of income in some areas is the colossal disadvantage of it which not only restricts one to earn better but also affects their career growth. To illustrate this, people in such areas do not earn sufficient, even though they are working hard for their livelihood. Furthermore, people do not prefer to live in their native town if the weather condition of such places is too harsh to live in. To exemplify, Uttarakhand, the sate of India, where heavy rainfalls are seen in the monsoons, faces the threatening risk of floods and cloudbursts. Thus, inhabitants of this area prefer to live in their homes.

To conclude, living near to the loved one is always preferable only if there are better career opportunities available in the locality. Though benefits are more as compared to the drawbacks, its contrary side cannot be ignored. However, all this depends upon the personal choices of an individual whether to stay near to the hometown or to settle away from it.

Votes
Average: 8.2 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-08-07 hitakshi patel 67 view
2023-02-22 whatever 89 view
2022-09-23 aman kola 82 view
2022-09-23 aman kola 78 view
2022-09-23 aman kola 73 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 63, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...jor purpose of living in the hometown is taking care of the parents as few indivi...
^^
Line 3, column 117, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of the parents as few individuals do not want to leave their parents alone at the...
^^
Line 7, column 563, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... to live in. To exemplify, Uttarakhand, the sate of India, where heavy rainfalls are see...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 162, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
... the locality. Though benefits are more as compared to the drawbacks, its contrary...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, so, thus, for example, in addition, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 79.0 41.998997996 188% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2046.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 426.0 315.596192385 135% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80281690141 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54310108192 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56123403245 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535211267606 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 637.2 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2861777894 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.684210526 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4210526316 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.10526315789 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314010665235 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0965795247234 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0569030510109 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168564066217 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.060676309281 0.056905535591 107% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.