Leisure is a growing industry, but people no longer entertain themselves as much as they used to because the use of modern technology has made them less creative. Do you agree or disagree?
In this day and age, leisure has advanced significantly with many new forms thanks to recent innovation. However, the use of modern entertainment sometimes makes people feel that they are dependent on technology thus affecting their creativity. Personally, I disagree with this point of view.
In bygone days, playing sports or watching TV were two of the most common ways to entertain. While playing sports is a healthy leisure activity, watching TV is not so much, and there is little to no creativity in this form of entertainment. In fact, people in the past had only a handful of ways to entertain themselves and not a lot of them require much imagination.
But this is not the case at the current time. With the recent development of technology and the internet, people are spoiled with choices for how they want to have fun. We have so many new forms of entertainment that it is actually hard to decide: from watching Youtube and TikTok to playing video games or surfing Facebook. At the first glance, there is also no creativity involved, but things are not that simple.
If we look at this from the other side, people, in order to have fun, are more creative. In the past, consumers of the leisure industry were strictly consumers. Today, people on Youtube, TikTok or Facebook are contents creators themselves. They are spending efforts and imaginations to create interesting stories, funny clips, bizarre posts in order to entertain their audiences, thus, in turn, entertain themselves. That requires creativity.
In conclusion, today’s entertainment is not only more in kinds but also more in creativity. So modern technology, in fact, gives more choices and it is up to people to make their choices.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, however, if, look, so, thus, while, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1431.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98606271777 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8587528395 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540069686411 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.7566995072 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.1764705882 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8823529412 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05882352941 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223163430246 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.062429837422 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0575264376506 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115224243501 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0439132236939 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.