Some people think that illegal internet downloads are having a negative effect on the music industry. Others feel that they have little or no impact on artists.
Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
There is a pressing issue in the music industry regarding with copyright as many people are downloading music online free of charge. This illegal course of act is thought to have hardly or no detrimental to artists, whereas others believe that this illicit act comes with baneful objectives. This essay would argue over both the views and conclude with my opinion.
On the one hand some would argue that there is little or no effect on artists provided that their songs are downloaded for free. This can be attributed to extended internet coverage over the public. As with the internet massive numbers of people are downloading songs online, artists would gain fame and in turn, it would make them available to sing these songs around the world touring. Consequently, all their investment that is lost from this illegitimate downloading would be covered or even exceeded by the revenue from the ticket sales at tour. To illustrate, the popular U k pop band earned a huge amount of money by touring. Thus, it made no sense for some to believe artists interest could be hurt by illegal music downloads.
On the other hand, some would concur with others who say there are innumerable damages to the artist resulting from their love of labour getting stolen. It takes a lot of effort and time for a person to create a masterpiece. That could further go on to becoming a chartbuster. If this song becomes way to common, then they cannot strike an appropriate bargain for their efforts for example Beyonce the famous singer of America’s New Album Illegally Downloaded 240,000 Times. Therefore, the sales of the original album had thus suffered a heavy blow. Why should anyone sanction such cheating?
TO summarize, despite having no impact or some benefits of a few singers, I firmly believe that downloading music illegally comes with lesser advantages and more disadvantageous in the long run. For the simple reason that you need to respect and worship art for it to grow.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 591, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... To illustrate, the popular U k pop band earned a huge amount of money by touring...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, if, regarding, so, then, therefore, thus, whereas, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1648.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91940298507 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6296016959 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.3534465308 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.9411764706 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7058823529 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88235294118 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21955859173 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0591647581569 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0603091343252 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133355967457 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0431217975941 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.