Some people think that it is responsibility of government to take care of environment, while others believe that it is the responsibility of people to take care of the environment. To what extent do you agree or disagree.
Throughout the last decade, the number of issues in regards to environmental hazards has substantially increased. Furthermore, an overwhelming majority of individuals are convinced that government should be in charge of looking after ecology. However, there are a significant amount of opponents conceding that regular people should be more mindful of environmental problems. This essay will argue that control over environment crucial issues is entirely important to be prime government’s responsibility.
On the one hand, it is claimed that regular people should take care about flora and fauna. That is to say, that socialization of environmental heritage accompanied by the privatization and commercialization of natural resources generate a vast majority of pollution-related problems. In addition, an enormously high rate of fuel consumption can drastically contaminate air and water with toxic gases emissions. It can be illustrated by the latest research conducted by Harvard University, which elucidated the fact that there has been a sharp decline in the number of environmental hazards in cities where people refused the usage of cars. Overall, it can be concluded that people should be responsible for preserving an environment in its primordial image via denying the use of unnecessary technological equipment, which can be deleterious for natural resources.
Despite the humans’ liability, the governance style in some countries involves permanent control over environment pollution through the set of strict measures, which can maintain quality of air and water purity at a positive level. In other words, government engagement in the process of controlling ecological problems can eradicate this tremendous issue in a long run. A paper published by Dr. John Watson, the world-renowned ecologist, reveals that laws, which force people to be more caring towards environment, are the most constructive methods of problem solving. Therefore, it is clearly seen that government can build a sustainable and drastically efficient ecological improvement scheme, thus it should be their responsibility to care for the environment.
This essay argued that government role in the process of monitoring environmental problems should be dominant. In my opinion, the use of people as the essential source of force which can control ecological issues is absolutely inappropriate and preposterous.
- Many people believe that road quality safety will be improved when the government will decrease the speed limit, other people believe that there are other ways of improving road safety.Discuss both views and give your opinion. Provide some examples from y 73
- Some people think that it is responsibility of government to take care of environment, while others believe that it is the responsibility of people to take care of the environment. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 78
- Nowadays culture is different in some ways comparing to the past Do you think the culture development has a positive or negative trend 67
- Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information, such as their hobbies or interests, and whether they are married or single. Some people say that this information may be relevant and useful. Others disagree.Discuss both these vie 84
- Sports help to a greater extent to build peace in the world. Do you agree or disagree? Give some examples and include relevant experiences in your response. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 50, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: regarding; with regard to
...t the last decade, the number of issues in regards to environmental hazards has substantially...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 277, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'amounts'?
Suggestion: amounts
...ology. However, there are a significant amount of opponents conceding that regular peo...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sibility to care for the environment. This essay argued that government role i...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, look, so, therefore, thus, in addition, in my opinion, in other words, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 7.30460921844 233% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2063.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 356.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.79494382022 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.47209532796 2.80592935109 124% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564606741573 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 659.7 506.74238477 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.19908609 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.533333333 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7333333333 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210588025986 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.074256626175 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0523122852401 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13150784634 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0358977737338 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.0946893788 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.75 50.2224549098 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.6 12.4159519038 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.14 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.