Some people think it would be a good idea for schools to teach every young person how to be a good parent.
Do you agree or disagree with this opinion? Describe the skills a person needs to be a good parent.
The learnings served in the schools are remembered effectively. Hence, some people, thoughtfully, suggested that education about parenthood given to all the adolescents by schools is a good idea. I am in support of this suggestion. Further, in this essay, several compelling reasons for my inclination with this notion, and a description of the skills of a person for becoming an ideal parent will be deciphered.
A good few reasons for upholding my opinion in the favour of this notion are schools being a good platform for young persons to learn anything with seriousness, and getting known about the hardship of being a parent. Whatever is taught in schools at an early age is grasped and memorised by most of the youngsters since most of them are well concerned about their academic curriculum. Furthermore, this early-age-education helps students to become aware of their parents' hard work. For instance, if students learn how to become a good parent at an early age only, they will appreciate all the efforts of their parents made to raise them. This positive change will prevent any of the children becoming a prodigal and choosing a wrong path of devastation.
There are lots of skills required for pursuing ideal parenthood. One of the most important skills is spying. Firstly, parents should be aware of what is going on in their children's life. This can prevent some accidents such as exploitation. Being watched by parents, however, is sometimes not accepted by their children since it alleviates their privacy level. So without letting children know, keeping an eye on them is a vital skill that every parent needs to be developed.
To conclude, educating young persons in schools to be a good parent, definitely, helps the children to understand their parents. As a result, adolescents would not mind even if they find their parents spying on them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 233, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
...ea. I am in support of this suggestion. Further in this essay, several compelling reaso...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, well, for instance, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1562.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05501618123 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88446295128 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540453074434 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.476008656 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.8823529412 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1764705882 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.47058823529 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.401269283995 0.244688304435 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12083717819 0.084324248473 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111373950408 0.0667982634062 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.262665073066 0.151304729494 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0333518885047 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.