Some people think that libraries are a waste of resources and money so computers should replace them. However, others do not agree. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
Some people argue that with appearance of computers, libraries became redundant and they are wasteful use of the budget. While others consider that book repositories are necessary and the society should save them. In this essay, I will examine both sides of the argument and then I will give my own opinion on the matter.
Opponents of libraries may support their view by the argument that modern servers are able to store gigabytes of the information, as plenty data as wanted. As well as this electronic storages are quite save and well-established, while paper books are can be easily destroyed by fire or grow moldy because of water. In addition, libraries are costly and many people prefer to read electronic books. Thus, keeping public libraries may be considered as money wastage and computers and electronic devises should shift them.
Meanwhile, on the other side of the argument are those who believe that libraries should be funded and computers are not able to take their place. To support this point of view, paper books are our heritage and libraries play a significant role in keeping it. For instance, some famous libraries store ancient books with covers from precious metal and stones. Furthermore, it is incomparable pleasure to read a paper book touching its sheets and thinking how many people have read it before you.
From my perspective, I think that libraries are essential because they give us touch of history; as well as for student it would more valuable to study literature into them instead of copying material in the Internet. For example, I have completely written my final project using paper books from the university library.
In conclusion, both sides of the argument have their merits. On balance however, I believe that libraries should be kept by nations, as they are part of our heritage and are necessary during educational process.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-03-03 | coolchris2100 | 78 | view |
| 2020-03-03 | coolchris2100 | 78 | view |
| 2020-03-03 | coolchris2100 | 78 | view |
| 2019-09-02 | ap11021987 | 89 | view |
| 2019-08-05 | Bhawna Sharma | 75 | view |
- Today s schools should teach their students how to survive financially in the world today To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
- People today are not as fit as they were in the past What are the causes of this What can governments do to deal with this issue 89
- Many parents mostly mothers stay at home to take care of the house and look after children Many believe that the government should pay them a wage for this To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Many people spend a lot of money on clothes haircuts and beauty products to enhance their appearance Some people think that it is a good way to spend money while others think that there is a better way to spend it Discuss both views and give your opinion 77
- Some people say it is a waste of time to plan for future It is more important to focus on present Do you agree or disagree 65
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 203, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'saved'.
Suggestion: saved
...l as this electronic storages are quite save and well-established, while paper books...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, may, so, then, thus, well, while, as for, for example, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1578.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07395498392 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67110272287 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546623794212 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9656897977 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.2 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7333333333 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.46666666667 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243995889835 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0805741069541 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.050322713335 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136426552745 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0555203466522 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.