People have different views about congestion caused by privately owned cars. Some Individuals think that in order to reduce the traffic it is better for private cars to stay off city centers while others think it is an unrealistic idea.
Banning of private vehicles will help in congestion reduction in cities. The amount of privately owned cars are on the rise due to the increase in the world’s population today. Nowadays, most cities encounter congestion because of overpopulation. Restricting private cars to only run in designated areas will drastically reduce traffic. This development would ensure the amount of cars that come to the city centers would be monitored, and this amount of cars would not be able to cause congestion in the city. Accessibility of the roads will be made easy for citizens, so they can carry out their daily activities without having to bother about the effects congestion can cause for them.
On the other hand, others discuss about the issue of banning privately owned cars in city centers and they see it as an unrealistic idea. Further, they said that private cars during this period of COVID-19 play a huge role in maintaining hygiene. Public transport will only make matters worse by exposing us to the virus when we get to stay together in a bus full of strangers. The issue of gridlock caused by congestion is a reality, but this can be controlled by using traffic lights and traffic wardens in the city. In addition, the elderly will be affected by the ban of privately owned vehicles whenever they need to go for medical appointments, grocery shopping etc.
In my opinion, I would suggest that banning of private cars from going to city centers can be limited to a few days during the week. The issue of congestion can be dealt with by having traffic lights properly installed around the city and the recruitment of traffic wardens to engage congestion and gridlocks.
In conclusion, banning privately owned cars entirely form city centers would not be appropriate, so let us install traffic lights to ensure that congestion can be controlled in cities.
- Scientists tell us that some activities are good for health and others are bad Despite knowing that millions of people still continue doing unhealthy activities What are the causes and what are the solutions to this 73
- Nowadays more and more people want to get things done instantly services information tasks Why is this Do you think it is a positive or negative development 56
- Scientists tell us that some activities are good for health and others are bad Despite knowing that millions of people still continue doing unhealthy activities What are the causes and what are the solutions to this 56
- Your friend is visiting your town Write a letter to give him her some suggestions on places to visit and where to find cheap accommodations In your letter you should When the best time to visit your town is Where the interesting places to visit are Where 73
- Water is a natural resource that should always be free Governments should ban the sale of bottled water To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 651, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'effects'' or 'effect's'?
Suggestion: effects'; effect's
...ties without having to bother about the effects congestion can cause for them. On ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, while, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1764.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 354.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98305084746 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70058861063 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.480225988701 0.561755894193 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 546.3 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.2459148145 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.25 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.125 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.328021504921 0.244688304435 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120100032285 0.084324248473 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.071449425969 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217348812721 0.151304729494 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0337961806386 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.