People have different views and suggestions about congestion caused by privately owned cars. Some Individuals think that in order to reduce the traffic it is better for private cars to stay off city centers while others think it is an unrealistic idea.
Banning of private vehicles will help to reduce congestion in cities. The amount of privately owned cars are on the rise due to the increase in the world’s population today. Nowadays, most cities encounter congestion because of overpopulation. Restricting private cars to only run in designated areas and neighborhoods will drastically reduce traffic. This development would ensure the amount of cars that come to the city centers would be monitored, and this amount of cars wouldn’t be able to cause congestion in the city. Accessibility of the roads will be made easy for citizens, so they can carry out their daily activities without having to bother about the effects congestion can cause for them.
On the other hand, others discuss about the issue of banning privately owned cars in city centers and they see it as an unrealistic idea. They said that private cars during this period of COVID-19 play a huge role in maintaining hygiene because they don’t expose you to the public. Public transport will only make matters worse by exposing us to the virus when we get to stay together in a bus full of strangers for a period of time. The issue of gridlock caused by congestion is a reality, but this can be controlled by using traffic lights and traffic wardens in the city. The elderly will be affected by this ban of privately owned vehicles whenever they need to go for medical appointments, grocery shopping and need to walk around the park.
In my opinion, I would suggest that banning of private cars from going to city centers can be limited to a few days during the week. The issue of congestion can be dealt with by having traffic lights properly installed around the city, and the recruitment of traffic wardens to engage congestion and gridlocks.
In conclusion, banning privately owned cars entirely form city centers would not be appropriate, so let us install traffic lights to ensure that congestion can be controlled in cities.
- you have arranged a visit to close friend in Canada but an important event at home now means you will have to change the dates of visit write a letter to your friend In letter explain the important event apologize for the situation suggest a new arrangeme 73
- Write a letter to your friend to recommend a book to read that you have read You should include Describe the book How it can help him her Where can he get it from 73
- You are studying English at a private language school attended by many international students You are planning a surprise birthday party for a friend who has been feeling particularly sad and homesick Write to another classmate and invite him her to the p 73
- Water is a natural resource that should always be free Governments should ban the sale of bottled water To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- You have recently visited a museum Now write a letter to your friend about the museum you have visited Write a letter to him her In your letter write where you went what you saw there how you felt about it 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 665, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'effects'' or 'effect's'?
Suggestion: effects'; effect's
...ties without having to bother about the effects congestion can cause for them. On ...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 419, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...gether in a bus full of strangers for a period of time. The issue of gridlock caused by conges...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, while, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 41.998997996 155% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1853.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 373.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96782841823 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70185161626 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.474530831099 0.561755894193 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 571.5 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9467522253 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.8125 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3125 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.1875 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319087701825 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118795384559 0.084324248473 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0736918749208 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209005392337 0.151304729494 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0349133782144 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.