Some people think that schools should select students according to their academic abilities. Others believe that it is better to have students with different abilities study together.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
There has been different views about schools’ approach to choosing pupils. Whilst some people consider selecting students with similar academic level as the best method, other believe a mixed class with multicolored attendants would lead to better results. Although there are valid reasons for both group’s statements, I would lead towards the latter.
From some people standpoint, some children are gifted, requiring to be identified and receive better services. Pupils with striking abilities in math or memorizing formulas, for instance, are far ahead from their peers, having the potential of learning more easily and with a higher pace. If these students are selected by schools, they will face more opportunities to enjoy the privilege of attending exceptional classes fitting them well. So it is better to prioritize them.
On the other hand, at the other end of the spectrum, there are people who believe all students, by and large, have their own specific talents which is required to not undermine. As a result, selecting some students and left others as normal and ordinary ones would exert a negative influence over their self-confident. Classes with a wide variety type of students, moreover, revolutionize children’s understanding of the society. Cooperation and studying with peers from different backgrounds benefit students from evaluating matters from different perspective and being more flexible and open-mindedness. So it can be said that in this case they will integrate better with their society.
By way of conclusion, schools, in my opinion, are warranted to choose students regardless of their academic level. This approach would result in more cooperation and understanding of different aspects of society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-07 | sagar123456 | 61 | view |
| 2019-09-08 | farlotfi | 61 | view |
| 2019-07-15 | bhatvishal@ | 73 | view |
- The maps below show the town of Lynnfield in 1936 and then later in 2007 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant The photo is in the next post 11
- Some people think that schools should select students according to their academic abilities. Others believe that it is better to have students with different abilities study together.Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 61
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1928 and 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant. 84
- computer games and films containing violence are popular today. some people think that these are harmful for our society and the government should ban them.others argue that such games and films are fine for entertainment.discuss both views and give your 61
- Some people argue that immigrants should adopt the local culture when immigrating to a new country An alternative view is that they can adapt to a new environment by establishing a minority community Discuss these two views and give your opinion 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, well, for instance, as a result, by and large, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1500.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61797752809 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02445530345 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.610486891386 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.0056949243 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.142857143 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0714285714 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92857142857 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348986186131 0.244688304435 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10445567696 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0625790427602 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201695546258 0.151304729494 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.049351178506 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.