Some people think that using animals for experimentation purpose is cruel, but other people think that is necessary for the development of science. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
At present, medical development on its peak. Undoubtly, Experts and scientists have discovered the numerous medicines to cure or to fight with even undefeatable diseases which is only possible because of experimentation on animals. However, it has given birth to propaganda that some people are supporting it in the name of development of science but meanwhile others think opposite about it. I will discuss both views with supporting points and give my opinion in upcoming paragraphs.
To begin with, First and foremost, testing a new medicine or drug is necessary before launching into the market because it enables us with surety that it would not be harmful for human life. Most importantly, history reveals that performing experiments on animals have proved boon for us as it discovered the drugs for such unbeatable diseases like Aids, cancer and so on. Additionally, we cannot test drugs on humans because its unpredictable results can be the reason of grave impacts on society.
On the other hand, people with rich thoughts about animal life conveys that animals holds the same rights as human do so such experiments are unmerciful for them. Secondly, in most of the countries people worship animals so testing drugs on animals is against their religious beliefs and sentiments. Finally, there is no doubt that humans have any right to do unnecessary experiments like cosmetics on animals as it considered as cruel act just for sake of the beauty products.
All in all, after describing the both views, I can conclude that doing experiments on animals is not a bad thing until it would harm the animals. It is only possible for today doctors to save hundreds of human lives because of testing new drugs on animals. Nevertheless, animals play important role in human life so unnecessary experiments like cosmetics should be banned or as a human it's our duty to save animal life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-23 | vishal sachdeva | 91 | view |
- Some people believe that improve public health should increase the number of sports facilities others believe that it has little effects and need other measures to improve it Discuss both views and give your opinion 90
- Some people think children are more successful in foreign language studies than adults Discuss 61
- The society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose and can even be damaging To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 84
- Earlier technological developments brought more benefits and changed the lives of ordinary people more than recent technological developments To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Parents and teachers make many rules for children to encourage good behaviour and protect them from danger However children would benefit from fewer rules and greater freedom To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 386, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...osmetics should be banned or as a human its our duty to save animal life.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, while, no doubt, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1578.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04153354633 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81422682326 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568690095847 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6936890852 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.384615385 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0769230769 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.15384615385 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252283693206 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0867295421959 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0649755120974 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146145939516 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0677947745571 0.056905535591 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.