Some people think watching movies is a waste of time. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Owing to the rapidly changing lifestyle, nowadays people have enormous ways of getting entertained. One of the major activity is watching movies; trend that is increasingly getting strength. Some people are of the view that watching movies is not a productive activity and cause no good. I completely disagree to this phenomenon, as I consider watching movies have innumerable benefits.I shall elaborate my stance with valid arguments and examples in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, there are enormous advantages for selecting this entertainment medium. Predominantly, one pivotal factor is learning and knowledge transfer. There are many movies made with the ambition to educate people over different topics. For instance, a movie series called “Cosmos” is made to create awareness about space and multi universe. Another obvious example would be historical movies made to educate people about incidents or wars happened in the past and how they were planned and executed.
Furthermore, watching movies can be a mode of relaxation for every age group. Due to the vast variety available for every type of movie, anyone can enjoy and spend good 2 hours in-front of screen. It has been observed that watching movies can distract our attention from everyday life problem for a certain amount of time and can relax one’s mind. Movies do influence our mind and can leave good or bad impact.
To recapitulate the aforementioned argument, I am of the opinion that movies are certainly not waste of time but the source of productive information and relaxation. I suggest, people should tend to watch more informative movies along with children in order to educate them through this playful activity. In the future, it is expected that people will tend to watch more movies and this industry will grow further.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 387, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: I
...tching movies have innumerable benefits.I shall elaborate my stance with valid ar...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, so, for instance, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1546.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29452054795 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88491979859 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606164383562 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4005494464 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.625 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.25 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.3125 7.06120827912 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24594816911 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0788628715908 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0552409081534 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14217012482 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0471284354455 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.