Some people think that you can never become fluent in language unless you have spent time living or working in that country.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There are whole host of viable ways to imbibe foreign language. It is assumed that in order to have a great commend of foreign language one have to live in country where the language is spoken. I am completely agree with this statement, as other ways to acquire foreign language are not as effective.
To begin with, the alternatives of picking up language within the country where it is considered as state language would be less effective. One alternative mode of learning language would be learning it at schools where it is thought by professional teachers. However, in state schools teachers technically can not deliver in depth language skills as they work with more than 20 students in average. Meanwhile, they resort to use their mother tongue to describe grammar and vocabulary. The other way which seems effective is to have private tutor, but this in terms deprive students from communicating outside lessons, which is sound obstacle to reach milestone. Therefor, these methods will not give the ability and skills to exchange information and ideas in foreign language fluently.
To continue with, it seems to me that the best method of language acquisition is learning it in country of origin. People who learn in that way grasp language in more natural way than those who are not. By mimicking locals and using language in daily bases one can hone his pronunciation and vocabulary within stimulating environment. For example, those who immigrating to the USA after a while can easily convey information and after some period of time they can fluently articulate their thoughts and understand others, despite the fact that they had poor language background. Furthermore, it is opined by educationalists that it takes four months to grasp basics and two years to be fluent in language when one exposed cross-border experience.
In conclusion, there are various ways to learn foreign language. Notwithstanding, I would like to single out the living in foreign country as the most effective way to practice language and be fluent.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 17, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'hosts'?
Suggestion: hosts
There are whole host of viable ways to imbibe foreign langua...
^^^^
Line 2, column 211, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'agreed'.
Suggestion: agreed
...the language is spoken. I am completely agree with this statement, as other ways to a...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 499, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...be grammar and vocabulary. The other way which seems effective is to have private...
^^
Line 4, column 174, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... that way grasp language in more natural way than those who are not. By mimicking...
^^
Line 4, column 441, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...asily convey information and after some period of time they can fluently articulate their tho...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 455, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nformation and after some period of time they can fluently articulate their thoug...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, so, while, for example, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1714.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11641791045 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8624297583 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537313432836 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4381744552 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.125 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9375 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.9375 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130613895755 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0438573779257 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0335646614868 0.0667982634062 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.08500320027 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0214654892451 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.