Cutting down forests is a real environmental threat; yet, this is still happening at a great rate around the world. Why do you think forests are being destroyed? Are there any benefits from the destruction of forests?
Deforestation has become an enormous problem for the environment nowadays, but nevertheless it is occurring in many parts of the world. In my opinion, the main reason for forests ruining is satisfaction of human needs, in particular enhancing of living conditions. But despite danger it involves, it is possible to find some advantages such as job openings or time saving.
Due to the fast-paced development of the world people’s demands have sufficiently increased. Therefore, to ensure proper housing and infrastructure, a huge amount of trees is cutting down annually. Real estate and construction companies are devastating forests in order to expand their territories and build new apartment blocks or malls. Extensive use of paper is another reason for forests vanishing. People often refuse to use recycled paper merely because its quality and colour may be a little bit worse. Daily a vast amount of paper is used in offices, packaging, decorations thus leading to cutting down of array of trees.
Although deforestation causes an untold harm to the environment, it still has some benefits. Firstly, as a result of construction projects new employment opportunities will be opened for local population and consequently improving their financial status and local economy in general. Furthermore, developed infrastructure will guarantee comfortable life. For instance, availability of necessary facilities such as shopping centres, schools, hospitals, will allow people to save their time and spend it productively rather than waste it for transportation.
To sum up, forests destruction indeed threatens the environment and nature, but it happens mainly in order to improve living conditions and make our lives easier. Developed infrastructure, availability of various accommodations prove existence of benefits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 76, Rule ID: BUT_NEVERTHELESS[1]
Message: Use simply 'but'.
Suggestion: but
...s problem for the environment nowadays, but nevertheless it is occurring in many parts of the wo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 498, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...because its quality and colour may be a little bit worse. Daily a vast amount of paper is ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, thus, for instance, in general, in particular, such as, as a result, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 7.30460921844 0% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1560.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.71428571429 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32838258927 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644688644689 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4392160864 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.0 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.4 7.06120827912 176% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146213481746 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0436497318361 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0388082062038 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0803259374868 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0390725115875 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.97 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.