Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later, and it is often argued that these are the best people to talk to teenagers about the dangers of committing a crime.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people advocate that ex-prisoners can amend themselves to become normal, productive members of society. Personally, I agree with the idea of this statement that allowing such people to share their experiences is the best way to discourage teenagers from breaking laws.
There are certainly some reasons why having someone who speaks from their experience is the best method. First and foremost, more obviously, teenagers are more likely to accept advice from people who have been through a lot in life. Reformed offenders can tell youngsters about how they involved in crimes, the dangers of a criminal lifestyle and what life in prison is really like. In this way, they can dispel the criminal mind of adolescents in which will greatly reduce the level of crime in the future and create safety environment for inhabitants.
However, the alternatives of using reformed criminals to educate teenagers about the dangers of committing crimes would much less effective. First of all, the option would be for police officers to visit schools and talk to young students.This could be useful information for young students regarding the regulation of laws, but students, more often than not, are unwilling to take advice from the figure of authority. Secondly, the other alternative would be for teachers to spread the consequences of committing crimes. Informative and credible as school teachers are, they are not likely to convince students as they have no experience in that field but theories in which not what students want.
In conclusion, although there are two distinctive spectrums to both approaches, I strongly agree that ex-offenders who have become good members of society after serving a prison sentence could help to deter adolescents from committing crimes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 240, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...isit schools and talk to young students.This could be useful information for young s...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'really', 'regarding', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'in conclusion', 'first of all']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.253246753247 0.247107183377 102% => OK
Verbs: 0.162337662338 0.155533422707 104% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0649350649351 0.0946595960268 69% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0616883116883 0.0501214627716 123% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0292207792208 0.0437548338989 67% => OK
Prepositions: 0.136363636364 0.122226691241 112% => OK
Participles: 0.0422077922078 0.0403226058552 105% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.7946412322 2.80594681477 100% => OK
Infinitives: 0.038961038961 0.0326793684256 119% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => More particles wanted.
Determiners: 0.0779220779221 0.0861772015684 90% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0292207792208 0.021408717616 136% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0292207792208 0.011925033212 245% => Maybe 'Which' is overused. If other WH_determiners like 'Who, What, Whom, Whose...' are used too in sentences, then there are no issues.
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1781.0 1933.35771543 92% => OK
No of words: 282.0 316.048096192 89% => OK
Chars per words: 6.31560283688 6.12580529183 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20517956788 97% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.390070921986 0.374742101984 104% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.294326241135 0.28420135186 104% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.234042553191 0.203846283523 115% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.156028368794 0.137316102897 114% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7946412322 2.80594681477 100% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.037074148 94% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58865248227 0.56093040696 105% => OK
Word variations: 62.8466082392 60.7387585426 103% => OK
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0891783567 68% => OK
Sentence length: 25.6363636364 20.7743622355 123% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.8777311823 49.517814964 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 161.909090909 127.492653851 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6363636364 20.7743622355 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.814263465372 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38877755511 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.99599198397 25% => OK
Readability: 55.0689877498 49.1944974215 112% => OK
Elegance: 1.70512820513 1.69124875643 101% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.491882384232 0.332605444948 148% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.149733384766 0.102741220458 146% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0714448693324 0.0668466124924 107% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.610816035385 0.534860350844 114% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.176648828742 0.148594505496 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.20692550724 0.134430193775 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0471615824264 0.0742795772207 63% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.253781619447 0.324371583561 78% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0756196888646 0.0638462369009 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.314435756788 0.228012699653 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0392449967934 0.058150111329 67% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.68436873747 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.41683366733 29% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 5.90881763527 85% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 2.5751503006 155% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 1.9629258517 51% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 10.4468937876 96% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations to cover all aspects.